Analyzing Political Rhetoric in the 2024 Indonesian Election: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach And Its Implications for Civic and Media Education

Agus Setyonegoro; Eko Kuntarto; Saharudin Saharudin; Desti Angraini

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7703

Analyzing Political Rhetoric in the 2024 Indonesian Election: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach And Its Implications for Civic and Media Education

Agus Setyonegoro, Eko Kuntarto, Saharudin Saharudin, Desti Angraini

Abstract

Political campaign rhetoric offers a rich context for fostering critical media literacy and civic reasoning in higher education. In the wake of Indonesia’s 2024 general election, campaign discourse has permeated digital platforms, shaping public perception and political engagement. This study applies Norman Fairclough’s dialectical-relational Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to online campaign materials published between November 2023 and February 2024. The research investigates how rhetorical strategies reflect power dynamics and ideological framing, while also exploring CDA’s applicability as a pedagogical tool in civic and media education. Analysis reveals recurring discursive patterns, including aggressive diction, strategic ambiguity, instrumental truth claims privileging practicality over evidence, and the erosion of empathetic or constructive language. These features often steer public narratives toward polarized, personality-driven debate formats, diminishing deliberative quality and civic trust. Findings underscore the civic implications of political discourse and support the integration of CDA-based tasks—such as metaphor audits, stance tracking, and ethical reframing—into curricula like SKOM4314 (Perencanaan Pesan dan Media). Positioned as both method and pedagogy, CDA enables students to critically engage with language, identify manipulative rhetoric, and produce evidence-based counter-discourse. The study contributes to discourse-analytic and educational scholarship by demonstrating how analysis of political language can directly inform instructional design aimed at strengthening democratic participation.

Keywords

critical discourse analysis; political rhetoric; Fairclough; civic education; media literacy

References

Alam, S. (2021). Penggunaan media sosial sebagai alat komunikasi politik. Avant Garde, 9(1), 67–80.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and method. Allyn & Bacon.

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Dewi, Y., Lande, T., & Efendi, A. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of Fairclough on the news reporting of PDIP Chairman in online media. In International Conference of Humanities and Social Science (ICHSS) (pp. 128–133).

Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. University of Chicago Press.

Eriyanto. (2003). Analisis framing: Konstruksi, ideologi, dan politik media. LKiS.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2008). A dialectical–relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and power (pp. 89–111). Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2008). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 162–186). Sage.

Fatmawati, E. (2019). Tantangan literasi informasi bagi generasi muda pada era post-truth. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 28(2), 57–66.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum. (Original work published 1970)

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Aspen Institute.

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.

Kencana, W. H., & Meisyanti, M. (2020). The implementation of mass media digital platform in Indonesia. Komunikator, 12(2), 90–105.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), 3–48.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12.

Sari, K., & Pranoto, B. E. (2021). Representation of government concerning the draft of criminal code in The Jakarta Post: A critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 11, 98–113.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1958)

Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(203), 203–218.

UNESCO. (2011). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Author.

van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as structure and process. Sage Publications.

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.

Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Stanford History Education Group.

Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Sage Publications.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7703