The Impact of Scaffolding Strategies Within the Zone of Proximal Development on Fourth-Grade Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics

Yuyun Yumiarty; Ummi Putri Sakina; Irni Latifa Irsal; Guntur Gunawan

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7523

The Impact of Scaffolding Strategies Within the Zone of Proximal Development on Fourth-Grade Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics

Yuyun Yumiarty, Ummi Putri Sakina, Irni Latifa Irsal, Guntur Gunawan

Abstract

Conceptual understanding in mathematics remains a persistent challenge for elementary students, particularly when instructional strategies fail to match their developmental needs. This study investigates the effectiveness of scaffolding strategies based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in enhancing fourth-grade students’ conceptual understanding in mathematics. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group was employed, involving 52 fourth-grade students from MIN 03 Kepahiang. Participants were divided into two groups: one received instruction using ZPD-based scaffolding strategies, while the other experienced conventional teaching methods. Data were collected through validated descriptive pre- and post-tests and analyzed using paired sample t-tests and two-way ANOVA. The findings indicate that scaffolding strategies significantly improved students’ conceptual understanding compared to conventional methods (p < 0.05). Students at the actual developmental level achieved higher scores (M = 75.15) than those at the potential level (M = 59.88). A significant interaction effect (p < 0.05) was found between teaching strategy and ZPD level, suggesting that scaffolding is more effective for students at the potential development level, while conventional methods better support students at the actual level. The study supports the use of developmentally appropriate scaffolding to enhance mathematical understanding. However, limitations include the study’s short intervention duration and single-school setting. Future research should explore long-term effects, apply ZPD-based scaffolding across diverse contexts, and investigate the use of technology for dynamic ZPD assessment. These findings reinforce the need for tailored instruction in mathematics education.

Keywords

scaffolding learning strategy; Zone of Proximal Development; concept understanding ability

References

Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9

Apriliyana, D. A., Masfu’ah, S., & Riswari, L. A. (2023). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas V pada Materi Bangun Ruang. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(6), 4166–4173. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i6.2149

Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036

Lestari, S. I., & Andriani, L. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Hidayah Singingi Hilir ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v5i1.6950

Muchtar*, A. H., & Ding, L. (2024). Integrated STEM Education in Indonesia: What Do Science Teachers Know and Implement? Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(1), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i1.35588

Mustofa, H. (2023). Strategi pembelajaran scaffolding dalam membentuk kemandirian belajar siswa. Al Fatih.

Payadnya, I. P. A. A., & Jayantika, I. G. A. N. T. (2018). Panduan penelitian eksperimen beserta analisis statistik dengan spss. Deepublish.

Poehnl, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Cognitive Load and Alternative Conceptions in Learning Genetics: Effects from Provoking Confusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.687790

Ramos, G., & Schleicher, A. (2018). The OECD PISA Global Competence Framework: Preparing our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World. OECD, 43. https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf

Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A. M., & Durkin, K. (2017). Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM, 49(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0834-z

Tias, A. A. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2015). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Sma Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Kelas XII IPA Di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7148

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Vidiyanti, D. (2020). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran scaffolding terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis tematik siswa kelas IV di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Merjosari 5 Malang. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wahyuni, T. (2016). Metode pembelajaran scaffolding untuk meningkatkan pemahaman integral pada mata kuliah kalkulus II. Naskah Publikasi Prodi Teknik Informatika, 30–31.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7523