Understanding by Design (UbD): An Effective Way to Design Elementary School Science Learning for the Competencies of Teacher Professional Education Students
Abstract
Many pre-service teachers in Teacher Professional Education (PPG) programs lack the competence to develop effective teaching materials aligned with curriculum goals. Understanding by Design (UbD) offers a structured approach to support this development through backward design. This study employed a quantitative research design using purposive sampling to select 116 PPG students as respondents. Data were collected via an online questionnaire distributed through Google Forms. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Findings reveal that UbD effectively supports the development of Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) through its three core stages: identifying desired learning outcomes, designing appropriate assessments and tasks, and planning targeted learning activities. Respondents demonstrated increased competence in aligning instructional strategies with learning objectives through this framework. The results suggest that UbD provides a practical model for guiding teachers in curriculum-aligned material development. The structured approach helps educators better understand learning goals and translate them into classroom practice. UbD is an effective framework for improving PPG students’ mastery of Subject Specific Pedagogy. It is recommended that teacher training programs integrate UbD principles into their instructional models. Teachers are also encouraged to continuously refine their teaching strategies in line with evolving curriculum demands.
Keywords
References
Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and attitudes in teaching science among 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31). 1-15
Arslan Buyruk, A., Erdogan, P., Cavusoglu Deveci, C., &Yucel Toy, B. (2018). The effects of understanding by design (UbD) model enriched with model of motivational design on the students’ speaking skills and motivation in English: A design based research. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(1), 82-94
Asari, A. R. (2014). Penggunaan Backward Design Dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Bernuansa Observation-Based Learning. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Jurusan Matematika FMIPA. Universitas Negeri Malang.23-31
Bowen, R. S. (2017). Understanding by design. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.
Dagdalan, G., &Tas, E. (2017). Effect of simulation-based science teaching on students’ achievement and attitudes towards computer-basedscienceteaching. Journal of Science Teaching, 5(2), 160-172
Gloria, R. Y., & Sudarmin, S. (2018). Kontribusi Asesmen Formatif dalam Tahapan Understanding by Design terhadap Pemahaman Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi. Peer Review Jurnal Ilmiah. Bioedukatia, 6(2).
Hosseini, H., Chalak , A., & Biria, R. (2019). Impact of Backward Design on Improving Iranian Advanced Learners' Writting Ability: Teachers' Practices and Beliefs. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 33- 50.
Karamustafaoglu, O., Bayar, A., & Kaya, M. (2014). An investigation of science teachers’ teaching methods and techniques: Amasya case. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 7(4), 436-462.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Natala, V. E. D., Vanalita, M., Pratama, A. O., & Astuti, M. D. (2023). Implementasi Understanding by Design dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran: Literature Review. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan (Vol. 2, No. 1).
Pertiwi, S., Sudjito, D. N., & Rondonuwu, F. S.,(2019). Perancangan Pembelajaran Fisika tentang Rangkaian Seri dan Paralel untuk Resistor Menggunakan Understanding by Design (UbD). Jurnal Sains dan Edukasi Sains, 2(1), 1-7
Putra, Z. R. I. A., Pratama, C. E., Pramudito, M. S., & Fauziyah, N. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Matematika Berdiferensiasi Berbasis Understanding by Design (UbD). Postulat: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 128-139.
Rosnaeni, R., Sukiman, S., Muzayanati, A., & Pratiwi, Y. (2022). Model-Model Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 467-473.
Setiyawati, N., Milianti, M., Septiani, U. R., & Titin, T. (2023). Analisis Pengembangan Rancangan Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Ubd. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 4(3), 170-174
Som, I., Turkan, A., & Altun, S. (2016). Design of introduction to educational sciences course using UbD: The evaluation of prospective teachers’ achievement, attitudes and opinions about the course. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research Online, 2(4), 1659-1672.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. www.ascd.org
Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by design (UbD) in EFL teaching: Teachers’ professional development and students’ achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 437-461
Yurtseven, N., & Dogan, S. (2018). UbD Implementations in Preschool Teaching: Reflections from the Teacher and Student Perspective. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 33(3), 656-671.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.6893
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Febrina Siska Widyaningtyas, Woro Sri Hastuti, Unik Ambar Wati, Sandy Abdi Kusumah
Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.