Evaluation of the Factory Implementation of the CIPP Method in Indonesian Vocational Education

Ida Nugroho Saputro; Aryanti Nurhidayati; Suharno Suharno; Chandra Winiawati; Revira Yunika; Mutiara Porista Kusumadevi

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3903

Evaluation of the Factory Implementation of the CIPP Method in Indonesian Vocational Education

Ida Nugroho Saputro, Aryanti Nurhidayati, Suharno Suharno, Chandra Winiawati, Revira Yunika, Mutiara Porista Kusumadevi

Abstract

Education is a crucial component of human resource development. Education will impact the quality of graduates and serve as a standard for business and industry. However, due to the resulting disparities, education becomes a serious issue, resulting in a high unemployment rate. One of the initiatives to improve the quality of education, particularly vocational education, is the implementation of the teaching factory. This study's objective is to evaluate the implementation of a teaching factory in vocational education, specifically at Vocational High School 2 Klaten for building majors. In this instance, the Directorate of Vocational High School Development evaluates the implementation of the teaching factory in the fields of expertise Building Modeling and Information Design (DPIB) and Building Concentration, Sanitation, and Maintenance (KGSP). In this study, context, input, process, and product (CIPP) were examined using a quantitative methodology known as purposeful sampling. According to the findings, the implementation of a teaching factory in vocational education remains insufficient due to a number of constraints, including a lack of human resources, infrastructure, and industry collaboration.

Keywords

CIPP; Evaluation Teaching Factory; Vocational Education; Vocational High School

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andersen, A. L., Brunoe, T. D., & Nielsen, K. (2019). Engineering education in changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing: Using problem-based learning in a learning factory environment. Procedia CIRP, 81, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.002

Directorate of Vocational High School Development. (2015). Teaching Factory Concept. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Directorate of Vocational High School Development. (2017). Teaching Factory Implementation Guide. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Johan, R., & Harlan, J. (2014). EDUCATION NOWADAYS. International Jounal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR).

Leal, L. F., Fleury, A., & Zancul, E. (2020). Starting up a learning factory focused on industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.049

Lund, H. B., & Karlsen, A. (2019). The Importance of Vocational Education Institutions in Manufacturing Regions: Adding Content to a Broad Definition of Regional Innovation Systems. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 660–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1616534

Martubi, M., Sofyan, H., & Munadi, S. (2022). Evaluation on Practice Assessment of Light Vehicle Chassis and Powertrain Maintenance Subject at Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15410a

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062

McGrath, S. (2012). Vocational education and training for development: A policy in need of a theory? International Journal of Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.12.001

Minister of Education. Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2008 concerning Standard of Facilities and Infrastructure for Vocational High Schools/Madrasah Aliyah Vocational Schools (SMK/MAK). , Pub. L. No. No. 40 (2008). Indonesia.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Building Indonesian Vocational Secondary Education: A Roadmap to 2030. Jakarta: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Prianto, A., Winardi, & Qomariyah, U. N. (2020). The Effect of the Implementation of Teaching Factory and Its Learning Involvement toward Work Readiness of Vocational School Graduates. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14117A

Ralph, B. J., Schwarz, A., & Stockinger, M. (2020). An implementation approach for an academic learning factory for the metal forming industry with special focus on digital twins and finite element analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.103

Riduwan. (2004). Measurement Scale of Research Variables. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sackey, S. M., Bester, A., & Adams, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 learning factory didactic design parameters for industrial engineering education in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.7166/28-1-1584

Stavropoulos, P., Bikas, H., & Mourtzis, D. (2018). Collaborative Machine Tool design: The Teaching Factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.004

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Chapter 16: The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In EVALUATION MODELS (pp. 279–317). Boston: Kluwer Academit Publishers.

Suharno, Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115(May), 105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092

Sutarto, H. (2017). Articulation of High Order Thinking Skills in Competency-Based Instruction in Indonesia Vocational and Technical High School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 102, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.36

Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Abele, E., Metternich, J., & Tenberg, R. (2016). Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033017

Triyono, M. B. (2015). The Indicators of Instructional Design for E- learning in Indonesian Vocational High Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.109

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. , Pub. L. No. 20 (2003). Indonesia.

Vijayan, K. K., Mork, O. J., & Giske, L. A. L. (2019). Integration of a Case Study into Learning Factory for Future Research. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.041

Warju, W. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3903