The Use of Learning Aids for Dyscalculia: Systematic Literature Review

Husna Fatwana; Dadan Dasari; Dadang Juandi

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2633

The Use of Learning Aids for Dyscalculia: Systematic Literature Review

Husna Fatwana, Dadan Dasari, Dadang Juandi

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine appropriate learning aids for dyscalculia children. Systematic literature review became the method in this study. This article reviews 13 articles involving more than 4939 subjects and respondents. We reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2021 from the Sage, SpringerLink, Taylor&Francis, and Wiley Online Library databases. All articles were classified by year, research approach, research objectives and strategies offered for dyscalculia children. The selection of articles found the use of manual tools and the use of technological aids. The results of the review analysis showed that learning with the help of technology had a greater impact on the learning outcomes of dyscalculia students.

Keywords

Dyscalculia, Learning Aids, Technology in Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alloway, T. P., & Carpenter, R. K. (2020). The relationship among children ’ s learning disabilities , working memory , and problem behaviours in a classroom setting : Three case studies. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2020.1

Amiyani, R. (2019). Self-confidence and mathematics achievement using guided discovery learning in scientific approach Self-confidence and mathematics achievement using guided discovery learning in scientific approach. 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042093

Atanasova-Pachemska, T., Lazarova, L., Arsov, J., Pacemska, S., Trifunov, Z., & T Kovacheva. (2015). Attitude of secondary students towards mathematics and its relationship to achievement in mathematics. Online Submission, 8(27), 109.

Baccaglini-frank, A., & Maracci, M. (2015). Multi-Touch Technology and Preschoolers ’ Development of Number-Sense. 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-015-0002-4

Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia : identification and intervention. 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4

Cipora, K., Patro, K., & Nuerk, H. (2015). Are Spatial-Numerical Associations a Cornerstone for Arithmetic Learning ? The Lack of Genuine Correlations. 9(4), 190–206.

Deruaz, M., Dias, T., Gardes, M., Gregorio, F., Ouvrier-buffet, C., Peteers, F., & Robotti, E. (2020). Exploring MLD in mathematics education : Ten years of research. 60(July), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100807

Ekblad, L. (2013). Autism , Personality , and Human Diversity : Defining Neurodiversity in an Iterative Process Using Aspie Quiz. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497722

Ellinor, J. (2019). It’s the “group” that matters: Dramatherapy working with a group of parents and their children who have profound and multiple learning difficulties. Dramatherapy, 40(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263067219834697

Hannant, P. (n.d.). Ineffective pathways and the price of conjecture. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12368

Houdé, O. (2019). 3-system theory of the cognitive brain: A post-Piagetian approach to cognitive development. In 3-System Theory of the Cognitive Brain: A Post-Piagetian Approach to Cognitive Development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115535

Howard-jones, P., Ott, M., Leeuwen, T. Van, & Smedt, B. De. (2015). The potential relevance of cognitive neuroscience for the development and use of technology-enhanced learning. 40(2), 131–151.

Huang, S. H., Wu, T. T., Chen, H. R., Yang, P. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). Mathematics assisted instruction system of M/U-learning environment. Proceedings 2012 17th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, WMUTE 2012, 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMUTE.2012.72

Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). Disorders of mathematics: Implications for adult functioning. In Adult Learning Disorders: Contemporary Issues (pp. 191–218). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838037

Krueger, S. L. E. V. D. M. F. (2010). Cognitive resource allocation for neural activity underlying mathematical cognition : a multi-method study. 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0264-7

Kuzmina, Y., Ivanova, A., & Kaiky, D. (2019). The effect of phonological processing on mathematics performance in elementary school varies for boys and girls : Fixed- effects longitudinal analysis. 45(3), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3518

Kyriazis, A., Psycharis, S., & Korres, K. (2009). Discovery Learning and the Computational Experiment in Higher Mathematics and Science Education : A Combined Approach. 4(4), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v4i4.1044

Lambert, R. (2019). Political , relational , and complexly embodied ; experiencing disability in the mathematics classroom. ZDM, 51(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01031-1

Liang, F., & Li, P. (2019). Characteristics of cognitive in children with learning difficulties. Translational Neuroscience, 10(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2019-0024

Lu, Y., Ma, M., Chen, G., & Zhou, X. (2020). Can abacus course eradicate developmental dyscalculia. (June), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22441

Lucangeli, D., Chiara, M., Martina, F., Annamaria, P., Valeria, P., Kenneth, P., … Penna, P. (2019). Metacognition and errors : the impact of self-regulatory trainings in children with specific learning disabilities. ZDM, 0(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01044-w

Matlin, M. W. (2009). Cognition (Seventh Ed). Wiley.

May, Y. S., & Ahmad, N. A. (2021). Characteristics of Dyscalculia in Mathematics Learning. 14(1), 15–22.

Menon, V. (2010). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of arithmetic : implications for learning and education. 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0242-0

Metikasari, S., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). Mathematics Learning Difficulties of Slow Learners on A Circle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012022

Miranda, A. T. (2018). Cognitive Ability , Psycho-sociological Characteristics and Study Habits of Students : A Structural Model on Mathematics Performance. 1(3), 51–57.

Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., & Sheese, R. (2008). Cognitive development: Neo-Piagetian perspectives. In Cognitive Development: Neo-Piagetian Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410618092

Naik, N. (2017). Dual PowerPoint presentation approach for students with special educational needs and note- takers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 6257(April), 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254970

Nas, S. E. (2021). Facilitating Conceptual Growth of the Mainstreamed Students with Learning Disabilities via a Science Experimental Guidebook : a Case of Physical Events.

Nick braisby. (2005). cognitive pshycology (Vol. 148; N. Braisby & A. Gellatly, eds.). Oxford University Press.

Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). International Journal of Disability , Cognitive and Emotional Factors in Children with Mathematical Learning Disabilities. (June 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2011.547351

Protopapas, A., & Parrila, R. (2018). Is dyslexia a brain disorder? Brain Sciences, 8(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040061

Rohizan, R., Soon, L. H., & Mubin, S. A. (2020). MathFun : Examining the Effectiveness of Calculic Model in Designing App for Dyscalculia Children. 1712, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1712/1/012031

Satria, R., Udinus, W., Sucipto, S., Heymans, P., & Systems, S. (2015). A Systematic Literature Review of Requirements Engineering for Self- Adaptive Systems Related papers.

Shamir, A. (2017). Expanding the Boundaries of Kindergartners ’ E-book Reading : Metacognitive Guidance for E-book Support Among Young Children at Risk for Learning Disabilities. 119, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711901315

Shuhaimi, A. N. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Level of Cognitive Ability in Mathematics within Two Different Schools in Tapah. 1(2), 43–50.

Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756

So, W. W. (2013). Connecting mathematics in primary science inquiry projects. (April 2012), 385–406.

Stranghöner, D., Wild, E., & Schwinger, M. (2021). Identifying predictors of performance in reading and writing in primary students with mild learning difficulties. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1954345

Strenberg, R. J. (2020). Psychology & Cognitive. Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2010, 375–414. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10547-16

Williams, P., Wray, J., Farrall, H., & Aspland, J. (2015). International Journal of Inclusive Fit for purpose : traditional assessment is failing undergraduates with learning difficulties . Might eAssessment help ? (February 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.802029

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2633