Enhancing Science Education in Primary Teacher Training: An Analysis of Course Implementation and Pedagogical Practices

Diana Ayu Rostikawati; Riandi Riandi; Diana Rochintaniawati; Wahyu Sopandi

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6705

Enhancing Science Education in Primary Teacher Training: An Analysis of Course Implementation and Pedagogical Practices

Diana Ayu Rostikawati, Riandi Riandi, Diana Rochintaniawati, Wahyu Sopandi

Abstract

Improving the quality of science education in teacher training is essential for developing competent educators. This study focuses on enhancing science instruction within the Primary School Teacher Education program at a private university in Serang City, Banten, by examining the implementation of the science course and related pedagogical practices. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving five sixth-semester pre-service teachers as participants. Data were collected through structured interviews lasting 30–45 minutes. The interviews explored multiple facets of the course, including syllabus availability, lesson plan alignment, instructional media usage, access to teaching materials, application of instructional models, learning activity sheets, assessment practices, and course activities. Findings indicate inconsistencies between course plans and classroom activities. Participants reported limited access to teaching resources and inconsistent use of instructional media. However, they emphasized the value of interactive activities and the need for varied assessment tools. Feedback highlighted the importance of structured syllabi, engaging media, and creative approaches that align with different learning styles. The results underscore the importance of student input in improving science education courses. Enhancements should focus on providing comprehensive instructional materials, integrating technology, and promoting pedagogical creativity. Diverse teaching strategies and assessment methods can foster active engagement and support the professional growth of pre-service teachers. Structured, student-informed improvements in course design and delivery are essential to prepare effective future educators, especially in science education.

Keywords

Science Education; Primary Teacher Education; Course Implementation; Pedagogical Practices

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2020). Exploring in-and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next? Teknologia Kemian Opetuksessa, 1(1), 3–3.

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281.

Ault, C. R., & Dodick, J. (2010). Tracking the Footprints Puzzle: The problematic persistence of science‐as‐process in teaching the nature and culture of science. Science Education, 94(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20398

Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dittmar, J., & Eilks, I. (2019). An interview study of German teachers’ views on the implementation of digital media education by focusing on Internet forums in the science classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(4), 367–381.

Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2020). PBLPOE: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 89–106.

Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019a). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands‐on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488

Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019b). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands‐on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3

Husain, M. A., & Khan, A. (2024). Development of Scientific Attitudes in Children: Concepts and Measures. UNIVERSITY NEWS, 62, 25.

Husband, G. (2020). Ethical data collection and recognizing the impact of semi-structured interviews on research respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), 206.

Iqbal, M. H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, M. A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100172.

Jin, H., Mikeska, J. N., Hokayem, H., & Mavronikolas, E. (2019). Toward coherence in curriculum, instruction, and assessment: A review of learning progression literature. Science Education, 103(5), 1206–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21525

Kahar, M. S., Syahputra, R., Arsyad, R. B., Nursetiawan, N., & Mujiarto, M. (2021). Design of Student Worksheets Oriented to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Physics Learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 96, 14–29.

Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Use of web 2.0 technologies to enhance learning experiences in alternative school settings. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(4), 272–283.

Kumarassamy, J., & Koh, C. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of infusion of values in science lessons: A qualitative study. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 109–136.

Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and Learning of Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Capacity through Systematic Research-Based Professional Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1625572

Lilibeth, G. A., & Natividad, E. L. (2023). Comparative Effectiveness of Indirect and Direct Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Science Instruction. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(3), 83–88.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&dq=Miles+and+Huberman%27s+(1994)+&ots=kGVA1ETWZO&sig=9c_QioZcEhybO9Yd_XGKInZJV4k

Muskita, M., & Subali, B. (2020). Effects of worksheets base the levels of inquiry in improving critical and creative thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 519–532.

Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 14–20.

Newman, P. M., & DeCaro, M. S. (2019). Learning by exploring: How much guidance is optimal? Learning and Instruction, 62, 49–63.

Nicolaou, C., Matsiola, M., & Kalliris, G. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching methodologies through audiovisual media. Education Sciences, 9(3), 196.

Sadler, D. R. (2016). Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.

Shute, V. J., Leighton, J. P., Jang, E. E., & Chu, M.-W. (2016). Advances in the Science of Assessment. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1127752

Tuma, F. (2021). The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 62, 231–235.

Ullah, A., & Anwar, S. (2020). The effective use of information technology and interactive activities to improve learner engagement. Education Sciences, 10(12), 349.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2021). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003234050&type=googlepdf

Walsh, P. P., Murphy, E., & Horan, D. (2020). The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957

Wilson, M. L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Cheng, L. (2020). The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, 156, 103941.

Yilmaz, E., & Korur, F. (2021). The Effects of an Online Teaching Material Integrated Methods on Students’ Science Achievement, Attitude and Retention. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 22–45.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6705