Essential Components of Teachers’ Self-Assessment for Professional Development in Indonesia

Rani Martalisa Taorina, Didi Suryadi, Tatang Herman

Abstract


Teachers’ self-assessment is recognized as a key mechanism for fostering professional growth and improving instructional practices. It allows educators to reflect on and develop their teaching performance autonomously. However, in the Indonesian context, there is a scarcity of self-assessment instruments that are both effective and measurable. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design to analyze existing teacher self-assessment instruments. Indicators from several available tools were examined and categorized using a theoretical framework comprising three core domains: knowledge of content, knowledge of pedagogy and practice, and knowledge of students. The analysis resulted in the identification of seven essential components for teacher self-assessment: (1) connecting students’ prior knowledge with new content; (2) effective delivery of instructional materials; (3) addressing students’ errors, difficulties, and misconceptions; (4) promoting active student participation; (5) building rapport among students and between teachers and students; (6) effective use of learning resources, media, and technology; and (7) selecting, using, and following up on assessments. These components were further structured across three developmental levels to reflect teachers’ growth. The proposed components serve as a foundation for developing more comprehensive and contextually relevant self-assessment instruments for teachers. By aligning self-assessment practices with pedagogical goals and classroom realities, these tools can support sustained professional development and instructional improvement.

Keywords


teacher professional development; teacher self-assessment; instrument assessment development

References


Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Bautista, A., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2015). Teacher professional development: International perspectives and approaches. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.1020

Berry, A., & Van Driel, J. H. (2013). Teaching about teaching science: Aims, strategies, and backgrounds of science teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112466266

Borgmeier, C., Loman, S. L., & Hara, M. (2016). Teacher self-assessment of evidence-based classroom practices: Preliminary findings across primary, intermediate and secondary level teachers. Teacher Development, 20(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1105863

Boris, O. O., & Ekiugbo, U. E. (2021). Enhancing teacher professional development through reflective teaching approach (Reflective practices: A means to teacher development). Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe987b42755105d44fc1569b06e310a9bd28485a

Cheung, R. H. P. (2009). The use of self-assessment to foster students’ learning in teacher education: An experience in teaching practice. Action in Teacher Education, 31(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2009.10463510

Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904264440

Fuller, F., & Brown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education: 74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 25–52). University of Chicago Press.

Jong, O. D. (2009). Exploring and changing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: An overview. In Teachers’ professional knowledge in science and mathematics education: Views from Malaysia and abroad (pp. 1–33).

Kaharasan, B. (2010). Preservice secondary mathematics teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of composite and inverse functions [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12612025/index.pdf

Khoshnevisan, B. (2017, September 25). Developmental stages of preservice teachers: A critical analysis [Blog post]. TESOL International Association. http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/tesolteis/issues/2017-09-25/2.html

Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004

Majewska, K. (2016). The effectiveness of interactive forms of teaching using interactive white board. E-Mentor, 2016(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.15219/em63.1223

Martin, J. (1977). The development and use of classroom observation instruments. Canadian Journal of Education, 2(3), 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1494419

Melo-Niño, L. V., Cañada, F., Martínez, G., & Mellado, V. (2016). The importance of PCK in the education of secondary school physics teacher: A case study on teaching electric fields. In Science Education in a Global Perspective (pp. 147–168). Nova Science Publishers.

Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Simsek, N., & Boz, N. (2016). Analysis of pedagogical content knowledge studies in the context of mathematics education in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3), 915–954. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0382

Villegas-Torres, P., & Lengeling, M. M. (2021). Approaching teaching as a complex emotional experience: The teacher professional development stages revisited. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 23(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v23n2.89181

Weimer, M. (2013, May 13). Six steps to making positive changes to your teaching. Faculty Focus. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/six-steps-to-making-positive-changes-in-your-teaching/

Widodo, E., & Sudarsono, F. X. (2016). Developing an observation instrument for assessing the effectiveness of English teaching at vocational secondary schools. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.8648




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.7413

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Rani Martalisa Taorina, Didi Suryadi, Tatang Herman

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.