Identifying Junior High School Student’s Learning Needs and Challenges in Science Education

Wiwit Yuli Lestari; Hertien Koosbandiah Surtikanti; Taufik Rahman; Riandi Riandi

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6347

Identifying Junior High School Student’s Learning Needs and Challenges in Science Education

Wiwit Yuli Lestari, Hertien Koosbandiah Surtikanti, Taufik Rahman, Riandi Riandi

Abstract

Understanding students’ needs in science education is essential for improving teaching strategies and learning outcomes. This study investigates students’ preferences regarding teaching methods, learning materials, and supplementary education outside school.The study employed a descriptive research design involving 119 students and 28 teachers from seven randomly selected schools in Ciamis. Participants had prior experience with online learning. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews and analyzed quantitatively using percentage-based analysis.Findings reveal that 95% of students enjoy learning science due to its real-life relevance. Approximately 79% favor practical-based learning methods, citing ease of understanding and increased engagement, while 21% reported disinterest or discomfort with practical activities. Face-to-face instruction was preferred by 88.2% of students for its interactive benefits, though 3.57% felt teachers did not sufficiently involve them, potentially limiting critical thinking development. Regarding learning materials, 79.8% of students confirmed material availability, preferring those that are visual, durable, and easy to understand. Only 7.6% of students pursued additional lessons, primarily to enhance comprehension or complete assignments.These findings highlight students' inclination toward interactive and visually supported science instruction. Barriers such as limited engagement and lack of exposure to practical learning should be addressed to foster a more effective educational experience.Identifying and addressing students’ preferences in science education can inform more effective instructional approaches and resource development.

Keywords

Junior High School; science education; learning need

References

Afolabi, F. (2021). Handling Disrupted Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Learners’ Experience in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.5.1.p.1-10

Bruner, J. S., & others. (1966). On cognitive growth. Studies in Cognitive Growth, 1–29.

Chavez, A. R., & Colin, L. M. (2015). Designer’s Education to User’s Definition Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6001–6004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.706

Estari, A. W. (2020). Pentingnya Memahami Karakteristik Peserta Didik dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 3 (3), Article 3.

Estriyanto, Y. (2016). A Review of Indonesian Pre-Service Teacher Certification Policy from the Point of View of the Philosophy of Vocational Education. International Confrence on Teacher Training and Education, 1(1), 245–253.

Irawati, H., & Saifuddin, M. F. (2018). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah pengantar profesi guru biologi di pendidikan biologi universitas ahmad dahlan yogyakarta. Bio-Pedagogi: Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, 7(2), 96–99.

Khoiri, M. (2021). Strategi pembelajaran guru dalam memenuhi kebutuhan belajar peserta didik ditengah pandemi covid-19 di SD Negeri 66 Gantarang kabupaten Sinjai. Jurnal Transformatif (Islamic Studies), 5(1), 75–94.

Krismawati, N. U., Warto, W., & Suryani, N. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan pada Bahan Ajar Penelitian dan Penulisan Sejarah di Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 3(3), 300–311.

Munandar, R. R., Rostikawati, T., & Susanto, L. H. (2022). Cognitive Load Lecture on Diversity and Classification of Vertebrates Through Moodle-Based Online Learning. Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 107–115.

Nisa, U. M. (2017). Metode Praktikum untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V MI YPPI 1945 Babat pada Materi Zat Tunggal dan Campuran. Proceeding Biology Education Conference.

Nurdiansyah, dan Amalia, F. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Pada Pelajaran IPA Materi Komponen Ekosistem. Pgmi Umsida, 1, 1–8.

Østergaard, E. (2017). Earth at rest: Aesthetic experience and students’ grounding in science education. Science & Education, 26(5), 557–582.

Singh, P., Sinha, R., Koay, W. L., Teoh, K. B., Nayak, P., Lim, C. H., Dubey, A. K., Das, A., Faturrahman, I., & Aryani, D. N. (2021). A comparative study on effectiveness of online and offline learning in higher education. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific (IJTHAP), 4(3), 102–114.

Sukiastini, I. G. A. N. K. (2024). Literature Review: Integrasi Model Pembelajaran Ipa Dengan Digitalisasi Dan Kearifan Lokal Untuk Menghadapi Tantangan Di Masa Depan. Penambahan Natrium Benzoat Dan Kalium Sorbat (Antiinversi) Dan Kecepatan Pengadukan Sebagai Upaya Penghambatan Reaksi Inversi Pada Nira Tebu, 4(4), 318–327.

Tyas, R. A., Wilujeng, I., & Suyanta, S. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran IPA berbasis discovery learning terintegrasi jajanan lokal daerah terhadap keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.28459

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

Wicaksana, G. C., Khoirina, S., Salsabila, Q. A., & Ismawati, R. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v11i2.57111

Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145–185.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6347