Project-Based Learning Through a Heutagogic Approach in Higher Education: Challenges, Technology and Implementation

Sutarjo Sutarjo; Acep Bahrum Kamil Acep Bahrum Kamil; Sya'roni Ma'shum Ma'shum; Wafa Haifa Zahra; Muhamad Taufik Bintang Kejora; Ade Irvi Nurul Husna

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6026

Project-Based Learning Through a Heutagogic Approach in Higher Education: Challenges, Technology and Implementation

Sutarjo Sutarjo, Acep Bahrum Kamil Acep Bahrum Kamil, Sya'roni Ma'shum Ma'shum, Wafa Haifa Zahra, Muhamad Taufik Bintang Kejora, Ade Irvi Nurul Husna

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PBL) with a heutagogic approach in universities to enhance student autonomy and critical thinking. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews, observations, and document analysis. The study involved 150 students from three universities in West Java. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in IBM SPSS 24, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis and triangulation techniques. Findings indicate that PBL with a heutagogic approach follows seven systematic steps: problem identification, learning objective formulation, project strategy planning, information collection, project execution, presentation of results, and reflection. This method significantly enhances students’ critical thinking, creativity, and independent learning skills. However, challenges include limited technological resources, the need for more structured lecturer guidance, and student time management issues. Technological tools such as Google Classroom, Zoom, and presentation software support PBL effectiveness, though unequal access to technology remains a constraint. Addressing these challenges requires institutional investment in infrastructure, faculty training, and policy development to foster autonomous and collaborative learning environments. The findings provide insights for higher education institutions on optimizing heutagogic-based PBL to develop graduates equipped with the skills needed in the modern workforce.

Keywords

Project Based Learning; Heutagogic Approach; College

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abraham, R. R., & Ramnarayan, K. (2016). Heutagogic Approach to Developing Capable Learners. Medical Teacher, 39(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2017.1270433

As-Sa’idah, M. M., Dedih, U., & Maslani, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Contextual Learning Models, Problem-Based Learning, and Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Agama Islam (Jipai), 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15575/jipai.v2i1.18786

Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, I. (2014). E-learning Platforms in Higher Education. Case Study. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 31). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.373

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076

Blaschke, L. M. (2017). Self-determined learning (Heutagogy) and digital media creating integrated educational environments for developing lifelong learning skills. The Digital Turn in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Learning and Teaching in a Changing World, 2001, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_10

Crespí, P., García-Ramos, J. M., & Queiruga-Dios, M. (2022). Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Its Impact on the Development of Interpersonal Competences in Higher Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.7.993

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. In SAGE Publications, In (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707181-60

Gregory, S., Bannister-Tyrrell, M., Charteris, J., & Nye, A. (2018). Heutagogy in Postgraduate Education: Cognitive Advantages for Higher Degree Online Students. Springer, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5249-1_32

Gupta, B., & Gupta, P. B. (2022). Atmanirbhar (self-reliant) Bharat -Heutagogy in Higher Education. MAZEDAN INT. J. OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, August.

Hafeez, M. (2022). Challenges and research gap in project-based learning – A review. International Journal of New Trends in Social Sciences, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijss.v6i1.5633

Halim, A., Nur, S., Vega, N. De, Nasta, M., & Nurfadhilah, A. S. (2023). Exploring Heutagogy in Indonesian Higher Education: Cultural Challenges and Advantages in Mobile-Based English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teaching. Veles Voice of English Language Education Society, 7(3), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.22026

Hashim, H., Saharani, M., Zulkifli, N., Mokhtar, M. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Conception of Innovative Teaching Methodologies among Lecturers at Selected Polytechnics in Malaysia. Creative Education, 10(05), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.105065

Heda, Y., F.X. Yudi Tryono, S. R., Priandani, A. P., & Emilzoli, M. (2024). Tren Penelitian Heutagogi di Pendidikan Tinggi: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik. Edutech Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(3), 319–335.

Heilala, J., Shibani, A., & de Freitas, G. (2023). The Requirements for Heutagogical Attunement within STEAM Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(16), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i16.42313

Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagogi, Andragogi Dan Heutagogi Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22, 65–71.

Jailani, M. Y., Maizam, A., Haris, A. S., Tee, T. K., & Nor Hidayah, H. (2020). Malaysia Technical University Lecturer Preferences Towards Heutagogical Activities. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(02), 4146–4150.

Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019). A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes and intentions to use educational technologies : a theoretical revision and recommended minimum scope of educational technology acceptance models. British Journal OfEducational Technology, 50(5), 2394–2413.

Kim, J. (2022). The Interconnectivity of Heutagogy and Education 4.0 in Higher Online Education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(4), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28257

La Rotta, D., Usuga, O. C., & Clavijo, V. (2020). Perceived service quality factors in online higher education. Learning Environments Research, 23(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09299-6

Lasauskiene, J., & Rauduvaite, A. (2015). Project-Based Learning at University: Teaching Experiences of Lecturers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 788–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.182

Lastariwati, B., Handayani, T. H. W., Sholihah, T. M., & Razzaq, A. R. B. A. (2022). Entrepreneurial motivation of culinary students through implementation of online heutagogy project-based learning for productive courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 28(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v28i2.48677

Limeri, L. B., Asif, M. Z., & Dolan, E. L. (2019). Volunteered or Voluntold? The Motivations and Perceived Outcomes of Graduate and Postdoctoral Mentors of Undergraduate Researchers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(2), ar13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0219

Lock, J., Lakhal, S., Cleveland-Innes, M., Arancibia, P., Dell, D., & Silva, N. De. (2021). Creating Technology‐enabled Lifelong Learning: A Heutagogical Approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1646–1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13122

Ma, H., & Chen, L. (2022). Time Management Disposition Mediates the Influence of Childhood Psychological Maltreatment on Undergraduates’ Procrastination. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15(June), 1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S367446

Majid, T. T., Permatasari, N. E., Farelluddien, M., & Yuniar, R. (2023). HEUTAGOGY-BASED LEARNING IN THE 5 . 0 ERA. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori Dan Praktik, 8(1), 77–85.

Nadhiroh, P. S., & Trilisiana, N. (2020). Keterampilan kolaborasi mahasiswa teknologi pendidikan dalam mata kuliah kewirausahaan berbasis proyek. Epistema, 1(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21831/ep.v1i1.32322

Ochanji, M., Twoli, N., Bwire, M., & Maundu, J. (2017). Teacher Mentoring for Effective Teacher Training and Development The Case of a Developing Country, Kenya. Teacher Education and Practice, 30.

Peredo, K. (2022). the Learning Spanish language and culture. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 23–24. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.141

Rahmasari, T. P., Juwani, G. M., Piliani, P., & Linda, R. (2020). YouTube for Project Based Learning Publications as e-learning Solutions in the Pandemic Period: Literature Review. Pancaran Pendidikan, 9(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v9i3.300

Rajesh Kannan, R., Mahajan, S., & Rajkumar, R. (2016). An approach on effective & efficient project-based learning (PBL). International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(8), 5920–5926.

Ramkissoon, P., Belle, L. J., & Bhurosy, T. (2020). Perceptions and experiences of students on the use of interactive online learning technologies in Mauritius. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20692

Septiana, S., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). The Ability of Student’S Problem Solving at Senior High School Grade X Based on Problem Based Learning. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (Bioedu), 10(1), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n1.p221-228

Shamansurovna, M. M., Shamansurovna, T. F., Malikovna, S. S., & Makhamadovna, Z. M. (2023). Modern Educational Technologies And Its Problems. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55349/ijmsnr.2021.1112

Sidhu, G. K., Ruofei, D., & Nawi, S. M. (2023). Enhancing Postgraduate Students’ Reading Skills via the Pedagogy-Andragogy-Heutagogy (PAH) Continuum Training Programme. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(4), 728–742. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i4.23985

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2245–2261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1716322

Stoten, D. W. (2021). Building Adaptive Management Capability: The Contribution of Heutagogy to Management Development in Turbulent Times. The Journal of Management Development, 40(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-10-2019-0448

Teichgräber, U., Ingwersen, M., Mentzel, H., Aschenbach, R., Neumann, R., Franiel, T., Herzog, A., Böttcher, J., Pfeil, A., Mensel, B., Kühnel, C., Freesmeyer, M., Fischer, M. R., & Zottmann, J. (2020). Impact of a Heutagogical, Multimedia-Based Teaching Concept To Promote Self-Determined, Cooperative Student Learning In Clinical Radiology. Röfo - Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Röntgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1313-7924

Turner, J., & Patrick, H. (2008). How Does Motivation Develop and Why Does It Change? Reframing Motivation Research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178441

Yoto, Y., Ulfatin, N. R., Zahro, A., Putra, A. B., Subandi, M. S., Rochmawati, R., & Santoso, A. (2022). The Heutagogy Model of Learning Innovation in Increasing The Skill Needs of The Digital Era of Vocational Students. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v28i2p98-104

Žerovnik, A., & Nančovska Šerbec, I. (2021). Project-Based Learning in Higher Education (pp. 31–57). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2082-9_3

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6026