Profile of Scaffolding Transfer in STEM-Based Open Inquiry Learning for Electromagnetics Practicum

Cicyn Riantoni; Rusdi Rusdi; Maison Maison; Upik Yelianti

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5795

Profile of Scaffolding Transfer in STEM-Based Open Inquiry Learning for Electromagnetics Practicum

Cicyn Riantoni, Rusdi Rusdi, Maison Maison, Upik Yelianti

Abstract

In the context of STEM-based open inquiry learning, scaffolding transfer involves providing assistance that enables students to explore, experiment, and investigate problems or questions independently. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of scaffolding transfer in STEM-based open inquiry learning during an electromagnetics practicum. This research used a qualitative method with a participatory observation design. The research subjects were 34 students who participated in the electromagnetics practicum. The research instruments consisted of observation guides and field notes. Data were collected through direct observation during the practicum and the analysis of related documents. Data analysis was conducted through coding to identify scaffolding patterns and their transfer. The results showed that there are variations in the percentage of scaffolding provided in STEM-based open inquiry learning on different topics. This variation reflects the dynamics of changing student needs along with the complexity of the material. These results also show that scaffolding is dynamic because the level of support can increase again when students encounter new concepts or difficult concepts. In addition, the highest scaffolding in the open inquiry process occurs at the “asking questions” stage, which indicates a great need for help at the beginning of learning. In contrast, no scaffolding was provided at the stage of “communicating the results of the investigation,” which reflects students' independence.

Keywords

scaffolding, STEM, open inquiry, electromagnetics, practicum

Full Text:

PDF

References

An, Y.-J., & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students’ Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(4), 552–568.

Ardiyati, T. K., Wilujeng, I., Kuswanto, H., & Jumadi. (2019). The Effect of Scaffolding Approach Assisted by PhET Simulation on the Achievement of Science Process Skills in Physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012035

Batuyong, C. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2018). Exploring the Effect of PhET ® Interactive Simulation-Based Activities on Students’ Performance and Learning Experiences in Electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121–131.

Belland, B. R., Kim, C. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920

Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Olsen, M. W., & Leary, H. (2015). A pilot meta-analysis of computer-based scaffolding in STEM education. Educational Technology and Society, 18(1), 183–197.

Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., & De Cock, M. (2015). Students’ difficulties with vector calculus in electrodynamics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020129

Burkholder, E. W., Miles, J. K., Layden, T. J., Wang, K. D., Fritz, A. V, & Wieman, C. E. (2020). Template for teaching and assessment of problem solving in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010123

Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658733

Eveline, E., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The Effect of Scaffolding Approach Assisted by PhET Simulation on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Students’ Learning Independence in Physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012036

Ferty, Z. N., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Physics Education Technology Simulation Assisted of Scaffolding Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012062

Furukawa, T., Watanabe, Y., Ogasawara, N., Kobayashi, K., & Itou, T. (2021). Current-induced magnetization caused by crystal chirality in nonmagnetic elemental tellurium. Physical Review Research, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023111

Guihard, V., Patapy, C., Sanahuja, J., Balayssac, J. P., Taillade, F., & Steck, B. (2020). Effective medium theories in electromagnetism for the prediction of water content in cement pastes. International Journal of Engineering Science, 150, 103273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103273

Hsu, Y.-S., Lai, T.-L., & Hsu, W.-H. (2015). A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 241–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9421-2

Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1

Koes-H., S., & Hanum, M. R. (2019). Nurturing higher order thinking ability through visual scaffolding in group investigation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012069

Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: the design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1458039

La Braca, F., & Kalman, C. S. (2021). Comparison of labatorials and traditional labs: The impacts of instructional scaffolding on the student experience and conceptual understanding. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010131

Lasa-Alonso, J., Olmos-Trigo, J., Devescovi, C., Hernández, P., García-Etxarri, A., & Molina-Terriza, G. (2023). Resonant helicity mixing of electromagnetic waves propagating through matter. Physical Review Research, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023116

Mustapha, R., Sadrina, Nashir, I. M., Azman, M. N. A., & Hasnan, K. A. (2020). Assessing the implementation of the project-based learning (PJBL) in the department of mechanical engineering at a Malaysian polytechnic. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(1 Special Issue), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.01.011

Nehru, N., Kurniawan, W., & Riantoni, C. (2023). Exploration of Students’ Skills in Describing Physics Problems: The Effect of STEM-Project-Based Learning. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 330. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.18289

Ngabekti, S., Prasetyo, A. P. B., Hardianti, R. D., & Teampanpong, J. (2019). The development of stem mobile learning package ecosystem. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16905

Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Open Guided Inquiry Laboratory in Physics Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 449–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9316-x

Pizzolato, N., Fazio, C., Sperandeo Mineo, R. M., & Persano Adorno, D. (2014). Open-inquiry driven overcoming of epistemological difficulties in engineering undergraduates: A case study in the context of thermal science. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010107

Rahmat, I., & Chanunan, S. (2018). Open Inquiry in Facilitating Metacognitive Skills on High School Biology Learning: An Inquiry on Low and High Academic Ability Irwandi. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 593–606.

Susilowati, E., Mayasari, T., Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2019). Scaffolding learning model to improve habits of mind students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052064

Tecson, C. M. B., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., & Soleria, H. J. B. (2021). Design of a 7E model inquiry-based STEM (iSTEM) lesson on digestive system for Grade 8: An open-inquiry approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012034

Tuada, R. N., Kuswanto, H., Saputra, A. T., & Aji, S. H. (2020). Physics mobile learning with scaffolding approach in simple harmonic motion to improve student learning independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012043

Uum, M. S. J. Van, Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education : scaffolding pupils ’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.009

van der Valk, T., & de Jong, O. (2009). Scaffolding science teachers in open-inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802287155

Wadana, R. W., & Maison. (2019). Description students’ conception and knowledge structure on electromagnetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012050

Zuza, K., Van Kampen, P., De Cock, M., Kelly, T., & Guisasola, J. (2018). Introductory university physics students’ understanding of some key characteristics of classical theory of the electromagnetic field. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020117

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5795