Adaptive Deep Learning–Driven Animated Media for Enhancing Science Concept Understanding in Elementary Education

Yudi Budianti; Dede Abdul Azis; Ayu Fitria

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9240

Adaptive Deep Learning–Driven Animated Media for Enhancing Science Concept Understanding in Elementary Education

Yudi Budianti, Dede Abdul Azis, Ayu Fitria

Abstract

Elementary science instruction in the digital era often lacks interactivity and responsiveness to diverse learning needs, particularly for abstract topics such as the water cycle. This study examines the effect of adaptive animated media supported by deep learning features on Grade 4 students’ conceptual understanding and compares it with conventional instruction.A quasi-experimental nonrandomized control-group pretest–posttest design was employed with 50 fourth-grade students at SDN Sukarahayu 02 (25 experimental; 25 control). Both groups completed a 20-item multiple-choice pretest and posttest, while the experimental group also responded to a perception questionnaire. The experimental group used adaptive animated modules featuring progress monitoring, branching reinforcement, differentiated practice, and targeted feedback, whereas the control group received lecture-based instruction with textbooks and worksheets. Data were analyzed using normalized gain scores and the Mann–Whitney test.Initial abilities were comparable (experimental = 52.35; control = 51.80). Posttest scores were higher in the experimental group (82.75) than in the control group (68.45). Learning gains were greater in the experimental group (g = 0.638, medium) compared to the control group (g = 0.345, medium). The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012). Student perceptions indicated increased engagement (88%), improved understanding (84%), enhanced visualization (88%), and higher motivation (80%).Adaptive animated media effectively supports conceptual understanding by providing personalized learning pathways and visualizing abstract processes, leading to more meaningful learning experiences than conventional methods.Deep learning–supported adaptive animation significantly enhances elementary students’ understanding of the water cycle and offers a more interactive and effective alternative to traditional instruction.

Keywords

adaptive; animated media; deep learning; elementary science; science concept understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alguacil, N. M., Avedillo, L., Mota-blanco, R., & Gallego-agundez, M. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Some Issues and Recommendations for Its Implementation in a Traditional Curriculum Setting in Health Sciences. MDPI: Education Sciences, 14(1179), 1–26.

Annetta, L., Johnson, A., Newton, M. H., & Franco, Y. (2024). Immersive Spatial Computing : How Technology Can Improve Science Content Reading and Vocabulary in Elementary Schools. MDPI: Education Sciences, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci14121355

APA. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Asscociation. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

Barut, E., Ozcan, T., & Dursun, O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners ’ motivation in distance Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5

Bryda, G., & Costa, A. P. (2023). Qualitative Research in Digital Era: Innovations, Methodologies and Collaborations. MDPI: Social Science, 12(570), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci12100570

Cao, W., & Huang, Z. (2025). Character generation and visual quality enhancement in animated films using deep learning. Sci Rep, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07442-3

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

Fatchurahman, M., Adella, H., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Development of Animation Learning Media Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1514a

Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

Gao, Y. (2025). Deep learning-based strategies for evaluating and enhancing university teaching quality. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100362

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Dept. of Physics Indiana University. https://web.physics.indiana.edu/sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf

Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024). Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis. MDPI: Electronics, 1(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/ electronics13183762

Hanif, M. (2020). The Development and Effectiveness of Motion Graphic Animation Videos to Improve Primary School Students ’ Sciences Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13416a

Kanchon, K. H., Sadman, M., Nabila, K. F., & Tarannum, R. (2024). International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering Enhancing personalized learning : AI-driven identification of learning styles and content modification strategies. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 5(1), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcce.2024.06.002

Koç, A., & Kanadlı, S. (2025). Effect of Interactive Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes in Science Education : A Network Meta ‑ Analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(1), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10202-7

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The Theory of the Estimation of Test Reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/BF02288391

Kuznetcova, I., Wen, Z., Glassman, M., Anderman, E., & Lin, T. (2025). Making immersive storytelling accessible : Interactive low-tech implementation in elementary school civic learning. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 31(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199967

Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y

Lin, Y., Chen, H., Xia, W., Lin, F., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Lin, F. (2025). A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Techniques in Educational Data Mining. Data Science and Engineering, 10(4), 564–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-025-00303-z

Matovu, H., Ayu, D., Ungu, K., Won, M., Tsai, C., Treagust, F., Mocerino, M., & Tasker, R. (2023). Studies in Science Education Immersive virtual reality for science learning : Design , implementation , and evaluation. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 205–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2082680

Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348

Mierlo, B. Van, & Beers, P. J. (2020). Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions : A review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.002

Morze, N., Trotsenko, L. V., Trybulska, E. S., & Borys. (2021). Implementation of adaptive learning at higher education institutions by means of Moodle LMS. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012062

Mou, T. (2023). International Journal of Educational Research Open Science learning with designed animation : Investigation of primary school children ’ s attitudes toward science learning , animation integration , and understanding level. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100246

Murtaza, M. I. R., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems : Issues , Challenges , and Solutions. IEEE Access, 10(1), 81323–81342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938

Qushem, U. Bin, Christopoulos, A., Oyelere, S. S., Ogata, H., & Laakso, M. (2021). Multimodal Technologies in Precision Education : Providing New Opportunities or Adding More Challenges ? MDPI: Education Sciences, 11(338), 1–19. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci11070338

Salazar, R. B. (2023). Design thinking as an effective method for problem ‑ setting and needfinding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(24), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00291-2

Salem, I. bin. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning : A Future-Oriented Approach to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement. International Journal of Post Axial, 2(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i2.299

Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–20. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9.pdf

Skulmowski, A. (2024). Learning by Doing or Doing Without Learning ? The Potentials and Challenges of Activity ‑ Based Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y

Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning : a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7

Strømme, T. A., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Students ’ Conceptual Sense-making of Animations and Static Visualizations of Protein Synthesis : a Sociocultural Hypothesis Explaining why Animations May Be Beneficial for Student Learning. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 1013–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09920-2

Tugtekin, E. B., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners’ motivation in distance Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5

Utaminingsih, S., Machfud, Sentosa, & Kassymova, G. K. (2024). Development of Learning Management with Animated Video to Increase Motivation and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 2(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.2.3142

Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Whalen, E. A. R., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). “ I just do what the boys tell me ” : Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit. Wiley: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21587

Xaveria, F., & Kristianingsih, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education : a systematic review of techniques for personalized learning. Discover Education, 4(458), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00908-6

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9240