Restorative Characteristics of School Gardens and Student Well-Being: Evidence from Indonesian High Schools

Rima Meslita; Tartila Tartila

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9015

Restorative Characteristics of School Gardens and Student Well-Being: Evidence from Indonesian High Schools

Rima Meslita, Tartila Tartila

Abstract

School-based green spaces are increasingly recognized as supportive environments for adolescent well-being, yet empirical evidence from Indonesian secondary schools remains limited. Drawing on Attention Restoration Theory (ART), this study examines how school gardens contribute to students’ psychological recovery and learning-related outcomes.This study employed a convergent mixed-methods design involving 566 high school students (aged 15–18) from SMA and MA schools in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Quantitative data were collected an online questionnaire measuring perceived restorativeness (Being Away, Fascination, Extent, Compatibility), visit patterns, and reported effects. Qualitative data were obtained from open-ended responses, interviews, and field observations of garden features. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correspondence analysis with chi-square tests (α = 0.05), and thematic content analysis.Students frequently used school gardens, primarily during break times for relaxation. Perceived restorativeness was strongly associated with gardens characterized by dense vegetation, canopy shade, water elements, and supportive facilities such as seating and gazebos. Students reported reduced stress, improved mood, and clearer thinking following garden visits. Correspondence analysis confirmed significant associations between restorative characteristics and environmental features, while qualitative findings reinforced the importance of vegetation and social spaces in shaping restorative experiences.The findings support ART by demonstrating that school gardens function as everyday restorative environments that enhance emotional regulation and attentional readiness. Integrating natural and functional design elements can strengthen the role of school gardens as learning-support infrastructure.

Keywords

restorative school gardens; attention restoration theory; psychological well-being; learning motivation; high school students

References

Anggraini, N. (2011). Elemen Ruang Terbuka Hijau. In Ruang Lingkup Materi Penelitian Restorasi. Publisher.

Chawla, L., Keena, K., Pevec, I., & Stanley, E. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001

Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00116-9

Chiesura, A. (2006). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138.

Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M., … Sunyer, J. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(26), 7937–7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112

Dee, C. (2003). Form and fabric in landscape architecture: A visual introduction. Taylor & Francis.

DEFRA. (2011). The Environment White Paper: The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature. DEFRA.

Evans, G. W., & Cohen, S. (1987). Environmental stress. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 571-610). Wiley.

Evered, E. (2016). Outdoor social spaces as recovery environment in urban settings: Connections to social ecology. Urban Studies Journal, 45(2), 234–251.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.

Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3–4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012

Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3-4), 264-275.

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons.

Han, K. T. (2007). Responses to landscape, visual and non-visual dimensions. Environmental Behavior Journal, 39(3), 335–351.

Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(4), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435

Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 SAGE Journals

Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228.

Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5

Irvine, K. N., Warber, S. L., Devine-Wright, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in Sheffield, UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(1), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10010417

Irvine, K. N., Warber, S. L., Devine-Wright, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of users' and providers' perceptions. BMC Public Health, 13, 887.

Kaplan, R. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

Kelz, C., Evans, G. W., & Röderer, K. (2015). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492418

Khaleghimoghaddam, M., Kahriman, C., & Sinan, M. (2024). The role of nature and the physical environment in mental relaxation: Konya Kyoto Park (Konya/Turkey). International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i1.943

Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 125–134.

Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015

Marliani, S. (2015). Pengaruh interaksi terhadap sistem psikologis di perkotaan. Jurnal Psikologi Perkotaan, 10(1), 23-30.

Mutiah, M. (2019). Kesehatan mental di kalangan remaja: Tinjauan faktor sosial dan pendidikan. Jurnal Kesehatan Anak, 11(3), 134-145.

Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003

Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2016). Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 19(7), 305–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155

Olmsted, F. L. (1870). Public Parks and the Enlargement of Towns. American Social Science Association.

Purcell, A. T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 93–106.

Stokols, D. (1979). A congruence analysis of human stress. Environmental Health Journal, 17(4), 29–43.

Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556.

Ulrich, R. S. (2007). Health benefits of gardens in hospitals. Plants for People Journal, 2(1), 16–19.

UNICEF. (2021). The State of the World’s Children 2021: On My Mind—Promoting, protecting and caring for children’s mental health. New York: UNICEF.

UNICEF. (2021). The State of the World's Children 2021: On My Mind: Promoting, Protecting, and Caring for Children's Mental Health. UNICEF.

White, M. P., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. H. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004

Wijono, B. (2010). Psikologi Umum. Universitas Indonesia Press.

Zhang, F., & Qian, X. (2024). A comprehensive review of the environmental benefits of urban green spaces. Sustainability, 16(9), 3612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093612

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9015