Designing a Decision Support System for Educational Resource Allocation

Lusy Tunik Muharlisiani; Widyatmike Gede Mulawarman; S Suwarni; Usanto S; Berman Hutahaean; Robbi Rahim

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.4120

Designing a Decision Support System for Educational Resource Allocation

Lusy Tunik Muharlisiani, Widyatmike Gede Mulawarman, S Suwarni, Usanto S, Berman Hutahaean, Robbi Rahim

Abstract

The effective allocation of educational resources is crucial for enhancing the quality of education. This study explores the development and application of a decision support system (DSS) using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Various entities are evaluated based on a set of critical criteria. Using the TOPSIS approach, entities were systematically ranked, offering a clear directive for optimal resource allocation. This study provides a significant tool for resource management, offering a transparent, objective, and data-driven process. However, DSS should complement other qualitative and contextual considerations in the decision-making process. Future research directions include the integration of temporal data, broadening the set of criteria, and the inclusion of machine learning for dynamic decision-making. Ultimately, this study underscores the value of systematic and data-driven processes in resource allocation, contributing to the improvement of the quality of education

Keywords

Educational Resource Allocation, Decision Support System, TOPSIS Method, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Quality Enhancement.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baker, B. D.; Corcoran, S. P. (2012). The Stealth Inequities of School FundingUnited State of America

Odden, A.; Picus, L. O. (2011). Improving Teaching and Learning When Budgets are Tight, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 93, No. 1, 42–48. doi:10.1177/003172171109300107

Plakhotnik, M. S.; Volkova, N. V.; Jiang, C.; Yahiaoui, D.; Pheiffer, G.; McKay, K.; Newman, S.; Reißig-Thust, S. (2021). The Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Student Well-Being and the Mediating Role of the University Support: Evidence From France, Germany, Russia, and the UK, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642689

Heckman, J. J.; Lochner, L. J.; Todd, P. E. (2006). Schools, Teachers, and Education Outcomes in Developing Countries, Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 2, 945–1017. doi:10.1016/S1574-0692(06)01007-5

Aljuaidi, A. (2017). Decision support system analysis with the graph model on non-cooperative generic water resource conflicts, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, 145. doi:10.14419/ijet.v6i4.7566

Karismariyanti, M. (2011). Simulasi Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Composite Performance Index, Jurnal Teknologi Informasi

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Dengan Simple Additive Weighting. (2014). Jurnal Teknik Elektro. doi:10.15294/jte.v6i1.3575

Maulana, A. A.; Hidayat, N. S. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Keluarga Miskin Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process – Technique For Order Of Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution ( AHP - TOPSIS ), Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (J-PTIIK) Universitas Brawijaya, Vol. 2, No. 10, 3890–3898

Watrianthos, R.; Kusmanto, K.; Simanjorang, E. F. S.; Syaifullah, M.; Munthe, I. R. (2019). Penerapan Metode Promethee Sebagai Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemeringkatan Siswa, JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, Vol. 3, No. 4, 381. doi:10.30865/mib.v3i4.1546

Pamučar, D.; Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, No. 6, 3016–3028. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057

Kaliszewski, I.; Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 54, 155–161. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042

Zanakis, S. H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, No. 3, 507–529. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1

Papathanasiou, J.; B, N. P.; Bournaris, T.; Manos, B. (2016). A Decision Support System for Multiple Criteria Alternative Ranking Using TOPSIS and VIKOR : A Case Study on Social Sustainability in Agriculture, ICDSST, Vol. 2, 3–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32877-5

Lestari, V. N. S.; Lestari, V. N. S.; Djanggih, H.; Aswari, A.; Hipan, N.; Siahaan, A. P. U. (2018). Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution as Decision Support Method for Determining Employee Performance of Sales Section, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2.14, 281–285. doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i2.12.14693

Liu, W.; Zhang, L. (2023). Performance Evaluation and Identification of Key Influencing Factors for Student Achievement Based on the Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS Model, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol. 2023, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2023/1253824

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.4120