Student’s Self-Regulated Learning in Online Class Design Based on Reflective Learning

Darmiany Darmiany; Siti Istiningsih; Iva Nurmawanti; Nurwahidah Nurwahidah; Mohammad Archi Mauldya

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.3947

Student’s Self-Regulated Learning in Online Class Design Based on Reflective Learning

Darmiany Darmiany, Siti Istiningsih, Iva Nurmawanti, Nurwahidah Nurwahidah, Mohammad Archi Mauldya

Abstract

This study explored the connection between Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) strategies and student learning outcomes, alongside detailing the SRL strategies students employ in reflective learning contexts. Conducted as a quantitative descriptive with 53 student participants, the research utilized correlation analysis to examine the interrelationships between various SRL strategies and employed a three-stage qualitative analysis process: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal significant positive correlations among SRL strategies, notably between learning responsibility and environmental structuring (r = 0.706), memory strategy and goal setting (r = 0.717), and goal setting and self-evaluation (r = 0.722). The least positive correlation was found between self-evaluation and organizing (r = 0.437). Additional positive relationships were identified between memory strategy and perceived value (r = 0.668), goal setting and value (r = 0.762), self-evaluation and value (r = 0.669), seeking assistance and value (r = 0.763), environmental structuring and value (r = 0.825), learning responsibility and value (r = 0.795), and organizing and value (r = 0.645). Reflective learning stages—comprising the forethought phase, the performance phase as evidenced by students presenting their experiences, and the self-reflection phase during evaluation—highlight the intricate dynamics of students' SRL strategies. This study underscores the positive impact of SRL strategies on learning outcomes, offering insights into the effective application of reflective learning in educational settings.

Keywords

academic achievement; elementary student; learning strategy; reflective learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aksal, F. A., Altinay, Z., de Rossi, G., & ÎşmaN, A. (2012). Being online peer supporter-ed: Experiences from a work-based learning programme. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 1–22.

Atmojo, S. E., Muhtarom, T., & Lukitoaji, B. D. (2020). The level of self-regulated learning and self-awareness in science learning in the covid-19 pandemic era. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25544

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Bell, J., & Rothberg, S. J. (2004). The Relationship between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context. Third International Conference on Vibration Measurements by Laser Techniques: Advances and Applications, 3411(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.307692

Campbel, S. (2020). Education and Curriculum Reform: The Impact They Have On Learning. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.1036

Cardinale, P., Rofi’i, M. S., Samputra, P. L., & Achdiawa, R. (2021). Enculturated Education for Strengthening Character Education in Preventing Intolerance and Radicalism. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 8(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v8i1.20359

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Darmiany, D. (2012). Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Riset dan Aplikasi. Arga Puji Press.

Darmiany, D., & Maulyda, M. A. (2022). Decreasing Creativity in Elementary School Students During Online Learning Transition. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 97(62), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.97.08

Desoete, A. (2019). Mathematics and metacognition in adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 82–100. www.iejee.com

Dhanpat, N., De Braine, R., & Geldenhuys, M. (2019). Preliminary development of the Higher Education Hindrance Demands Scale amongst academics in the South African context. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1595

Docherty-Skippen, S. M., Karrow, D., & Ahmed, G. (2020). Doing Science: Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes and Confidence Teaching Elementary Science and Technology. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(1), 25–35.

Dukewich, K. R., & Vossen, D. P. (2015). Toward Accuracy, Depth and Insight: How Reflective Writing Assignments Can Be Used to Address Multiple Learning Objectives in Small and Large Courses. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4258

Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(17). https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2022376118

Gencoglu, B., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2021). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Variability in Student Perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725407

Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Dúo-Terrón, P., Ramos Navas-Parejo, M., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., & Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2020). Scientific Performance and Mapping of the Term STEM in Education on the Web of Science. Sustainability, 12(6), 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062279

Hobbins, J. O., Eisenbach, M., Ritchie, K. L., & Jacobs, S. (2018). Investigating the Relationship between Residence Learning Community Participation and Student Academic Outcomes in a Canadian Institution. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.2.7

Jalal, M. (1970). Kesiapan Guru Menghadapi Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Masa Covid-19. SMART KIDS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.30631/smartkids.v2i1.61

Kamardeen, I. (2015). Critically Reflective Pedagogical Model: a Pragmatic Blueprint for Enhancing Learning and Teaching in Construction Disciplines. Construction Economics and Building, 15(4), 63. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4607

Khoerunnisa, N., Eti Rohaeti, E., & Sekar Ayu Ningrum, D. (2021). Gambaran self regulated learning siswa terhadap pembelajaran daring pada masa pandemi covid 19. FOKUS (Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling Dalam Pendidikan), 4(4), 298–308. https://www.journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/fokus/article/view/7433

Klimova, B., Zamborova, K., Cierniak-Emerych, A., & Dziuba, S. (2022). University Students and Their Ability to Perform Self-Regulated Online Learning Under the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.781715

Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Designing and integrating reusable learning objects for meaningful learning: Cases from a graduate programme. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3072

Lidiawati, K. R., & Helsa. (2021). Online learning during covid-19 pandemic : how self-regulated learning strategies impact student engagement ? Jurnal Psibemetika, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v14i1.2570

Miles, & Hubernasn. (1992). Analysis of qualitative data (terj). Press Library.

Pham, T. T. T., Le, H. A., & Do, D. T. (2021). The Factors Affecting Students’ Online Learning Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bayesian Exploratory Factor Analysis. Education Research International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2669098

Reuter, T., Schnotz, W., & Rasch, R. (2015). Drawings and Tables as Cognitive Tools for Solving Non-Routine Word Problems in Primary School. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(11), 1387–1397.

Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2014). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Savchuk, T. (2017). Сlassification Schemes of Argumentation in the Humanities Discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije, 16(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.1.10

Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.3947