Analysis of The Development of Non-Cognitive Assessment Instrument to Support Online History Learning in Jambi City High School

Willy Cahyadi; Dian Aswita; Tri Zahra Ningsih

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2044

Analysis of The Development of Non-Cognitive Assessment Instrument to Support Online History Learning in Jambi City High School

Willy Cahyadi, Dian Aswita, Tri Zahra Ningsih

Abstract

This research is important to do because (1) there is a lack of an accurate non-cognitive skill assessment tool to assess non-cognitive skills in online learning; (2) it is difficult for teachers to measure students' cognitive skills during online learning due to the limited assessment tools available; and (3) only a few instruments have been developed to measure non-cognitive skills in social science learning, particularly history learning. Based on this gap, it's critical to examine the creation of non-cognitive skills evaluation instruments, particularly for use in online history classes. We collect data through surveys and questionnaires, answering questions. The study's subjects were Jambi City Senior High School teachers, a group of 15 from five different schools. Proportional Random Sampling Strategy is the sampling technique used in this study. An observation sheet and a questionnaire sheet were utilized as research instruments in this study. The questionnaire sheet consists of a questionnaire sheet to collect data on non-cognitive skills. The results of the study were examined using descriptive statistical methods. Non-cognitive skills are critical to acquire in online learning, according to the findings of the study. According to the research, 81.67% of teachers strongly believe that non-cognitive skills have an impact on student success. Non-cognitive qualities including discipline, independence, time management, teamwork, motivation, and technological skills are identified by 84.44 % of teachers as having a significant impact on the success of online learning. According to the teacher, 93.3% strongly agreed to create an assessment instrument to test this skill. The importance of non-cognitive instrument development is evident from the preceding discussion.

Keywords

Assessment, Non-Cognitive Skills, Online Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388

Bakri, F., Rasyid, R., & Mulyaningsih, R. D. A. (2015). Pengembangan Modul Fisika Berbasis Visual untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 01(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.01211

Belaya, V. (2018). The Use of e-Learning in Vocational Education and Training (VET): Systematization of Existing Theoretical Approaches. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 92-101.

Blanco, Q. A., Carlota, M. L., Nasibog, A. J., Rodriguez, B., Saldaña, X. V., Vasquez, E. C., & Gagani, F. (2020). Probing on the Relationship between Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy while engaging in Online Learning amidst COVID-19. Journal La Edusci, 1(4), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v1i4.220

Borghans, L., Meijers, H., & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The role of noncognitive skills in explaining cognitive test scores. Economic inquiry, 46(1), 2-12.

Bouchard Jr, T. J., Segal, N. L., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M., & Krueger, R. (2003). Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson–Patterson conservatism scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 959-969.

Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of human resources, 43(4), 738-782.

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological science, 16(12), 939-944.

Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Self-control and academic achievement. Annual review of psychology, 70, 373-399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230

Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K. E., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Tai, R. H. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field methods, 18(3), 223-244.

Fazekas, K. (2020). The Growing Importance of Non-Cognitive Skills in Job Search and at Work.

Gutman, L. M., & Schoon, I. (2013). The impact of non-cognitive skills on outcomes for young people. Education Endowment Foundation, 59(22.2), 2019

Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor economics, 24(3), 411-482.

Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031.

Indira, D., & Sakshi, A. (2017). Online Learning. International Education & Research Journal, 3(8), 32-34.

Jencks, C. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America.

Krskova, H., Wood, L. N., Breyer, Y. A., & Baumann, C. (2020). FIRST: principles of discipline for 21st Century skills. In Industry and Higher Education (pp. 265-289). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0874-5_12

MacGregor, K. E., Carnevale, J. J., Dusthimer, N. E., & Fujita, K. (2017). Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of personality and social psychology, 112(4), 607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000130

Misra, F., & Mazelfi, I. (2021, February). Long-Distance Online Learning during Pandemic: The Role of Communication, Working in Group, and Self-Directed Learning in Developing Student’s Confidence. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research.

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological review, 84(3), 231.

Ouazad, A. (2014). Assessed by a teacher like me: Race and teacher assessments. Education Finance and Policy, 9(3), 334-372.

Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4

Spees, L. P. (2019). Evaluating non-cognitive skills among students switching into and out of charter schools in North Carolina. Journal of School Choice, 13(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2018.1560856

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Stewart, C., & Bower, M. (2019). Novice online educator conceptual frameworks: a mental model exploration of mindful learning design. Educational Media International, 56(1), 14-43.

Wanzer, D., McKlin, T., Edwards, D., Freeman, J., & Magerko, B. (2019, February). Assessing the Attitudes Towards Computing Scale: A Survey Validation Study. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 859-865).

Wentling, T. L., Waight, C., Strazzo, D., File, J., La Fleur, J., & Kanfer, A. (2000). The future of e-learning: A corporate and an academic perspective. Knowledge and Learning Systems Group University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign.

West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 148-170.

Xu, J., Du, J., Wang, C., Liu, F., Huang, B., Zhang, M., & Xie, J. (2020). Intrinsic motivation, favorability, time management, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Motivation, 72, 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101677

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2044