Multimodal Feedback Workshop for English Teachers in Designing Questions Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill

Syafryadin Syafryadin; Dian Eka Chandra Wardhana; Annisa Astrid

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1151

Multimodal Feedback Workshop for English Teachers in Designing Questions Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill

Syafryadin Syafryadin, Dian Eka Chandra Wardhana, Annisa Astrid

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether or not there is quality improvement of HOTS-based questions through multimodal feedback made by English teachers. Besides, this study intended to find out the forms of feedback given during the implementation of multimodal feedback and English teachers' perception of multimodal feedback in designing HOTS-based English questions workshops. This study used a mixed-method involving 30 English teachers willing to participate in the training. Furthermore, research data collection was done through the provision of tests, interviews, and observations. Several experts have validated the instruments used in this study. The data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, while qualitative data in interviews and observation sheets were analyzed using several stages, including data reduction, data display, and concluding. The results of this study indicated a quality improvement of HOTS-based English questions that have been made by English teachers, which was evidenced by an increase in the results from pretest to posttest. The next finding is that three types of feedback helped teachers make HOTS-based English questions through multimodal feedback: peer feedback, oral conference, and written feedback. Another finding was that English teachers gave a positive perception towards designing HOTS-based English questions through multimodal feedback because these activities provided positive input on their ability to make HOTS-based English questions. In conclusion, the findings of this study benefit English teachers in designing HOTS-based questions, so that teachers can implement the result of the workshop in the teaching and learning process.

Keywords

English questions, Higher order thinking skill, Multimodal Feedback, Workshop

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anasy, Z. (2016). HOTS (Higher order thinking Skill) in reading exercise. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 3(1), 51–63.

Anggraini, N. P., Budiyono., P., & H. (2019). Analysis of higher order thinking skills students at Junior high school in Surakarta. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–9.

Bahar, A. (2017). English national examination questions. Ahzaa.

Bartels, N. (2003). Written peer response in L2 writing. English Teaching Forum, 4(1), 34–37.

Brookhart, S. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. ASCD.

Campbell, B. S., & Feldmann, A. (2017). The power of multimodal feedback. Journal of Curriculum Teaching, Learning, and Leadership in Education, 2(2), 1–6.

Chuang, W. (2007). The effects of four different types of corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing in Taiwan. Dayeh University Bulletin, 4, 123–128.

Creswell. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Dyan, L. N. (2017). Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Multimodal Instructor Feedback: A Multiple Case Study. ProQuest LLC.

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74.

Elshirbini, I. I., & Elashri, A. F. (2013). The impact of the direct teacher feedback strategy on the EFL secondary stage students’ writing performance. Mansoura University.

Emery, V. K., Edwards, P. J., Jacko, J. A., Moloney, K. P., Barnard, L., Kongnakorn, T., & Scott, I. (2003). Toward achieving universal usability for older adults through multimodal feedback. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, CCU 2003, 46–53.

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.

Faroha, D. N., Muslem, A., & Fajrina, D. (2016). Teachers’ feedback on students’ writing. Research in English and Education (READ, 1(1), 34–43.

Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62.

Hadzic, S. (2016). Oral and written teacher feedback in an English as a foreign language classroom in Sweden. Linaeus University Degree Project.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (2009). Qualitative research in applied Linguistics: A practical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hurst, W., & Vriens, K. (2016). Multimodal feedback for finger-based interaction in mobile augmented reality. ICMI ’16: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction October, 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993148.2993163

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.

Ismail, N., Maulan, S., & Hasan, N. H. (2008). The impact of teacher feedback on ESL students’ writing performance. Academic Journal of Social Studies, 8(1), 45–54.

Jacko, J., Emery, V. K., Edwards, P. J., Ashok, M., Barnard, L., Kongnakorn, T., Moloney, K. P., & Sainfort, F. (2004). The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults’ task performance given varying levels of computer experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001659213

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Lee, J.-H., & Spence, C. (2008). Assessing the benefits of multimodal feedback on dual-task performance under demanding conditions. Conference Paper, 185–192.

Lee, J., Poliakoff, E., & Spence, C. (2009). The effect of multimodal feedback presented via a touch screen on the performance of older adults. LINCS, 128–135.

Maolida, E. H. (2013). A descriptive study of Teacher’s oral feedback in an ESL young learner classroom in Indonesia. K@ta, 15(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.15.2.117-124

Pakbaz, R. (2014). The effect of written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing performance: Explicit Vs. Implicit. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5), 12–17.

Panhoon, S., & Wongwanixh, S. (2013). An analysis of teacher feedback for improving teaching quality in primary schools. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Science. 5th World Conference on Educational Science, 116, 4124–4130.

Phillips, M., Henderson, M., & Ryan, T. (2016). Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. Conference Proceedings ASCILITE.

Pilten, G. (2010). Evaluation of the skills of 5th grade primary school students’ high-order thinking levels in reading. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2, 1326–1331.

Pramawati, A. A. I., & Wardana, I. K. (2016). Pendekatan penyusunan soal bagi guru-guru bahasa Inggris SMP Sekecamatan Mengwi. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 5(1), 49–59.

Sabari, H. Y. (2010). Metodologi penelitian wilayah kontemporer. Pustaka Pelajar.

Samarindo, S., Yufrizal, H., & Kadaryanto, B. (2013). Analyzing Teacher’s feedback used in teaching. speaking. U-JET : UNILA Journal of English Teaching, 2(2), 1–9.

Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik multivariat. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Sun, M., Ren, X., & Cao, X. (2010). Effects of multimodal error feedback on human performance in Steering tasks. IPSJ Journal, 31(12), 2375–2383.

Yusuf, F. N., Widiati, U., & Sulistyo, T. (2017). Multimodal feedback provision in improving pre-service teachers’ competence. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 239–246.

Zhang, Y. (2018). Analysis of Using Multimodal feedback in writing instruction from EFL learners’ perspective. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(4), 21–29.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1151