Enhancing Students' Learning Interest and Conceptual Understanding in Sociology: Using the Analogy Method and Canva Infographic Media

Iwan Ramadhan, Munawar Thoharudin, Hadi Wiyono, Sabirin Sabirin, Suriyanisa Suriyanisa

Abstract


This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining the analogy method with Canva infographics to enhance conceptual understanding and student engagement in Sociology learning, a subject often perceived as abstract and unengaging. A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design was conducted with 36 grade XI Sociology 6 students at SMA Negeri 8 Pontianak. Data collection involved pretests, posttests, Likert-scale questionnaires, and observation sheets to assess understanding and engagement. The findings revealed a significant improvement in posttest scores (mean pretest = 62.5; posttest = 81.5; p < 0.001). The gain index (G = 0.5278) indicated a moderate increase in conceptual understanding, while Cohen’s d value of 1.58 reflected a large effect size. The analogy method simplified abstract sociological concepts by linking them to students’ real-life experiences, while Canva infographics provided creative and systematic visualizations of complex ideas. This combination also encouraged critical and creative thinking, enhancing student engagement. The study highlights the potential of integrating analogy-based methods with digital tools like Canva to address challenges in teaching abstract subjects. The findings support constructivist and dual-coding theories, which emphasize experiential learning and the integration of verbal and visual information. This research demonstrates that analogy methods paired with Canva infographics significantly improve students’ understanding and engagement in Sociology. Further studies should explore the broader applicability of this method across diverse subjects, educational levels, and learning environments.

Keywords


Analogy Method; Canva Infographics; Interest in Learning; Conceptual Understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afifah, L., & Umam, N. K. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Analogi terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas III. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i2.1735

Al-dhaimat, Y., Al-mohtadi, R., & Jwaifell, M. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Analogies in the Acquisition of Scientific Concepts Among Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(10), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/13-7-02

Asri, A. N. (2019). Designing a 21st Century Assessment in EFL Learning Context. ISoLEC: International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture, 335–348. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3915

Bai, B., Nie, Y., & Lee, A. N. (2022). Academic self-efficacy, task importance and interest: relations with English language learning in an Asian context. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746317

Celik, T. (2021). Examination Of Sample Course Design Studies Performed By Pre-Service Social Studies Teachers By Using Digital Technologies. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.849910

Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.697878

Deliana, A., Romalinca, R., Omerlin, O., Krisbet, K., & Meldawati, M. (2023). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Canva sebagai Media Pembelajaran Luring. Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.57251/multiverse.v2i2.1258

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 179–186.

Fikriyyani, I. N., & Supriyanto, T. (2024). Development of Canva-Based LowkE-Book Learning Media as a Companion to PjBL to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. 10(9), 6384–6395. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8458

Gautam, K. K., & Agarwal, R. (2023). The New Generation Teacher: Teacher as a Facilitator. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 11(7), 2320–2882. www.ijcrt.org

Gopinath, B., & Santhi, R. (2021). Development and evaluation of fishbone-based advanced computational thinking (FACT) pedagogy: A teacher-student collaborative learning environment in engineering and science education. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 108–122.

Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The Effects of Writing on Learning in Science, Social Studies, and Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744

Gunstone, R. F. (2013). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 143–158). Routledge.

Harrison, S., & Gibbons, C. (2013). Nursing student perceptions of concept maps: From theory to practice. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.5480/10-465

İlhan, G. O., & Şin, M. (2024). Reflections of “ Use of Comics in Social Studies Education ” Course : The Opinion and Experiences of Teachers Reflections of “ Use of Comics in Social Studies Education ” Course : The Opinion and Experiences of Techers. SANE Journal : Sequential Art Narrative in Education, 2(8), 1–20.

Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., & Setyono, I. D. (2019). Guided discovery: An alternative teaching method to reduce students’ rote learning behavior in studying geometric transformation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1265(1), 0–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012019

Ishi, H., & Yamauchi, H. (1994). A study of cognitive loading in dual-coding theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1 Pt 2), 458. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.458

Keri, Z., & Elbatarny, H. (2021). The Power of Analogy-Based Learning in Science. HAPS Educator, 25(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2021.003

Mohamed, E. A. S., Ali, M. A. O., & Mohamed, M. H. A. (2023). The communicative dimension of graphic design elements - Such as infographics. Brazilian Journal of Science, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i7.283

Murtadho, M. I., Rohmah, R. Y., Jamilah, Z., & Furqon, M. (2023). The Role Of Digital Literacy In Improving Students’ Competence In Digital Era. AL-WIJDÃN Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.58788/alwijdn.v8i2.2328

Prihantini, P., Istianti, T., Rukmini, A., & Sutarto, S. (2023). Canva Learning Media to Improve Students’ Learning Achievement in the Merdeka Curriculum. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 2221–2231. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.1940

Ricardo, & Meilani, R. I. (2017). Impak minat dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa (The impacts of students’ learning interest and motivation on their learning outcomes). Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 2(2), 79–92.

Rinneheimo, K. M., & Suhonen, S. (2022). Languaging and conceptual understanding in engineering mathematics. LUMAT, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1729

Sadighi, F., Zarafshan, M. (2006). Effects of Attitude and Motivation on the Use of Language Learning Strategies by Iranian EFL University Students. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities of Shiraz University, 23(1).

Saleem, A., & Akhbar, R. A. (2022). Annals of Human and Social Sciences Effect of Analogy Based Teaching on Students ‘ Chemistry Learning at. 3(3).

Salsabila, Y. R., & Muqowim, M. (2024). Korelasi Antara Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Lev Vygotsky Dengan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (Pbl). LEARNING: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 813–827.

Saxena, P., Singh, S. K., & Gupta, G. (2023). Achieving Effective Learning Outcomes through the Use of Analogies in Teaching Computer Science †. Mathematics, 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11153340

Serevina, V., & Hamidah, I. (2022). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) based Geothermal Energy Source Digital Module Assisted by Canva Application. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012063

Shana, Z. A., & Shareef, M. A. El. (2022). Science Teachers’ Use of Analogies: Findings from Classroom Practices. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 859–872.

Sheikhlar, A., Thorisson, K. R., & Thompson, J. (2022). Explicit general analogy for autonomous transversal learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 192, 48–62.

Tillander, M. (2011). Creativity, Technology, Art, and Pedagogical Practices. In Art Education (Vol. 64, Issue 1, pp. 40–46).

Timonera, P. G., Patria, A., Seveses, J. M., Montebon, A. F. J., Payla, J., & Arrojado, A. M. (2023). Impact of Analogical Learning on Metacognition and Scholastic Achievement of College Students in Physical Science. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(7), 2454–6186. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS

Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014). Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies. Higher Education Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n1p1

Tise, J. C., Sperling, R. A., Dann, M. S., & Young, T. M. (2023). Teaching Postsecondary Students to Use Analogies as a Cognitive Learning Strategy: An Intervention. CBE Life Sciences Education, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-05-0084

Traboco, L., Pandian, H., Nikiphorou, E., & Gupta, L. (2022). Designing Infographics: Visual Representations for Enhancing Education, Communication, and Scientific Research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(27), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e214

Umam, H. I., & Jiddiyyah, S. H. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Ilmiah Sebagai Salah Satu Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.645

Vargas, I. M., Cabrera, C. I. G., Cortez, C. A. A., Apaza, I. M. A., & Reátegui, M. D. (2022). The canva platform and meaningful learning in regular basic education. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(June), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns7.11213

Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4). https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32

Yuningsih, Y., & Susilo, M. J. (2018). Kajian Pendekatan Analogi dalam Pembelajaran Biologi yang Bermakna. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v3i3.188

Yuruk, N., Beeth, M. E., & Andersen, C. (2009). Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual teaching practices on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9089-6




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6385

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Iwan Ramadhan, Munawar Thoharudin, Sabirin Sabirin, Suriyanisa Suriyanisa

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.