Integrating Decision Support Systems in Education: A Comprehensive Approach

Pendais Hak; Kundharu Saddhono; Putri Hana Pebriana

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4420

Integrating Decision Support Systems in Education: A Comprehensive Approach

Pendais Hak, Kundharu Saddhono, Putri Hana Pebriana

Abstract

The current study examined educational Decision Support Systems (DSS) using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. This study evaluated traditional face-to-face teaching, online learning, and blended learning based on four criteria: effectiveness, cost efficiency, accessibility, and technological requirements. Each criterion was weighted according to its importance. After standardizing and weighting the selection matrix, each instructional style was given a composite score for direct comparison. Blended learning outperformed the other methods, scoring 0.620. The findings suggest that integrating digital and traditional education could boost efficiency. However, the model was sensitive to weighting assignments and couldn't account for nuanced qualitative factors. Refined weight assignment, qualitative variables, and AI could improve schooling and other decision-making in the future. This study showed that DSS and SAW can help make educated education decisions.

Keywords

Decision Support Systems, Simple Additive Weighting, Blended learning, Weight assignment, Informing decision-making

Full Text:

PDF

References

Advanced Learning. (2012). In Advanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.5772/170

Akınoğlu, O., & Karsantık, Y. (2016). Pre-Service Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.925a

Brown, H. D. (2006). Principles of language learning and Teaching, Fifth Edition. Pearson Education.

Díaz-Maggioli, G. (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fauziah, F., Prayitno, P., & Karneli, Y. (2020). Meningkatkan Kesiapan Belajar Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Behavioral. AL-IRSYAD, 10(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v10i1.7657

Haswan, F. (2017). Decision Support System For Election Of Members Unit Patients Pamong Praja. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v1i1.14

Hendriana, H. (2009). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metaphorical Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematik, Komunikasi Matematik, dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Hughes, R. (2002). Teaching and Researching: Speaking. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.06.002

Kalyani, D., & Rajasekaran, K. (2018). Innovative Teaching and Learning. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), S23–S25. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.162

Karismariyanti, M. (2011). Simulasi Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Composite Performance Index. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi.

Kharisman Ndruru, R. (2020). Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Pemilihan Jaksa Terbaik Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Medan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 367–372.

Nuphanudin, N., Komariah, A., Shvetsova, T., Gardanova, Z., Podzorova, M., Kurniady, D. A., Gladysheva, M., Dudnik, O., Taduran, R. J. O., & Kosov, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Students’ Motivation Factors in the Competency-Based Approach: A Case Study of Universities in Russia and Indonesia. Emerging Science Journal, 6(3), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-03-012

Primadasa, Y., & Juliansa, H. (2019). Penerapan Metode Vikor dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Bonus Pada Salesman Indihome. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 10(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v10i1.2228

Primasari, C. H., Wardoyo, R., & Sari, A. K. (2018). Integrated AHP, Profile Matching, and TOPSIS for selecting type of goats based on environmental and financial criteria. International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics, 4(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijain.v4i1.105

Rusdiyanto, R., Karman, J., Toyib Hidayat, A., Muli Peranginangin, A., Tambunan, F., & Hutahaean, J. (2020). Analysis of Decision Support Systems on Recommended Sales of the Best Ornamental Plants by Type. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1566(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012047

Sriyanto, S., Buchori, A., Handayani, A., Nguyen, P. T., & Usman, H. (2020). Implementation multi factor evaluation process (MFEP) decision support system for choosing the best elementary school teacher. International Journal of Control and Automation.

Suprapto, E. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual, Pembelajaran Langsung Dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif. INVOTEC, 11(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.17509/INVOTEC.V11I1.4836

Tanjung, N. S., Dani Adelina, P., Siahaan, M. K., Purba, E., & Afriany, J. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Teladan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Composite Perfomance Index (CPI). In Jurnal Riset Komputer (JURIKOM).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4420