The Effect of Problem Posing, CUPs and Critical Thinking on HOTS-Based Learning Achievement

Ika Dewi Lestari, M. Japar, Amalia Sapriati

Abstract


This study aimed to determine the effect of the learning model, which consists of problem posing and conceptual understanding procedures (CUPs) and critical thinking on learning outcomes-oriented (HOTS) on the content of mathematics lessons. The research was conducted at a state elementary school in Jakarta, with a sample of 68 students. The independent variables are learning models and critical thinking, while the dependent variable is HOTS-oriented learning outcomes on the content of mathematics lessons. The method is an experimental method with a 2 x 2 research design. Data were analyzed using normality, homogeneity and Anova tests; Tukey's test was also used as a follow-up test. The results showed: 1) there were differences in the learning outcomes of HOTS-oriented mathematics between students who used the problem-posing learning model and students who used the CUPs learning model; 2) there are differences in HOTS-oriented mathematics learning outcomes between students who have high critical thinking skills and those who have low critical thinking skills; 3) there is an interaction effect between learning models and critical thinking on HOTS-oriented mathematics learning outcomes; 4) there are differences in HOTS-oriented mathematics learning outcomes for students who have high critical thinking skills between those using the problem-posing learning model and the CUPs model; 5) there is no difference in the learning outcomes of HOTS-oriented mathematics students who have low critical thinking skills between those using the problem-posing learning model and the CUPS model. The conclusion of the research is the problem posing learning model and critical thinking skills affect the HOTS-oriented learning outcomes of mathematics lessons. This implies that problem posing and CUPs are effective learning models in improving learning outcomes, so they can be taken into consideration and as new alternatives for teachers.

Keywords


Conceptual Understanding; Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS); Learning outcomes; Mathematics; Problem Posing; Procedures (CUPs)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L.W., &Kratwohl, D. . (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assessmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Pustaka Pelajar.

Astuti, L. (2018). No Title. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/174162/tidak-familiar-dengan-model-soal-alasan-skor-pisa-indonesia-rendah

Falach, H. N. (2016). Perbandingan keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dan problem posing dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10635

Kurniawati, E. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Modifikasi Conceptual Understanding Procedures (M-CUPs) terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Peserta Didik SMP. Universitas Terbuka.

Mills, D., Feteris, S., Mulhall, P., & McKittrick, B. (2003). Conceptual understanding procedures (CUPs). Science Education Research Group, 1–5.

Mudjiono, D. dan. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Departemen Pendidikan dan Rineka Cipta.

Ngalimun. (2015). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Aswaja Pressindo.

OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. Oecd, 1–10.

Parwines, Z. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif dan Berpikir Kritis terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta didik Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Paul, R.W., & Elder, L. (2002). Critical Thinking: Tool for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Pittalis, M., Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2004). A structural model for problem posing. Proceedings of the 28th …, 4, 49–56. http://www.emis.ams.org/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR058_Pittalis.pdf

Purwanto. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Rosdakarya.

Sani. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Tsmast.

Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Stoyanova, E. (2005). Problem-posing strategies used by Years 8 and 9 students. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 61(3), 6–11. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Australian-Mathematics-Teacher/164525411.html

Suarsana, I. M., Lestari, I. A. P. D., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019). The effect of online problem posing on students’ problem-solving abilitiy in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12152a

Syah, M. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Thobroni, M. (2015). Belajar & Pembelajaran Teori dan Praktik. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Walle, J. (2007). Matematika Pengembangan Pengajaran Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. Erlangga.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.737

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ika Dewi Lestari

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.