Designing the Curriculum of the Islamic Banking Study Program towards Higher Education Sustainable Learning

Purnama Putra; Rizal Fahlevi; Rafika Rahmawati; Isfandayani Isfandayani

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4294

Designing the Curriculum of the Islamic Banking Study Program towards Higher Education Sustainable Learning

Purnama Putra, Rizal Fahlevi, Rafika Rahmawati, Isfandayani Isfandayani

Abstract

The acceleration of change with the COVID-19 pandemic has made a leap in all aspects, including the banking industry. Islamic banking, which is only a few decades old, has shown a significant increase in assets and institutions that need to be supported by the presence of human resources who understand the characteristics of these institutions so that they do not only focus on domestic affairs but develop overseas. Redesigning the Islamic banking curriculum is urgent in order to prepare the students to become graduates who can be in line with the needs of industrial world. This study aims to redesign the Islamic banking curriculum through in-depth study of stakeholders, namely study program administrators, industry associations (Islamic banking), graduate users, and scientific associations. The method used in this research is a combination by first mapping using the Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) method and then deepening and matching it with the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method to produce priority strategy. The priorities generated based on the SWOT and ANP matrices are : (1) Increasing stakeholder links and matches, (2) Increasing graduate competence, (3) Periodic review and evaluation of the curriculum, (4) Increasing Lecturer capacity. Therefore, Sustainable learning in Islamic banking must be supported by stakeholders by linking and matching in order to fill the need with the availability of competent human resources.

Keywords

ANP, Curriculum, Islamic Banking, SWOT

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aisyi, G. R., & Zulkarnain, L. (2020). SWOT Analysis In An Educational Institution (Case Study: Baitul Qur’an Islamic Boarding School, Depok). JURNAL EKONOMI DAN PERBANKAN SYARIAH, 8(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v8i1.177

Ascarya, Rahmawati, S., & Sukmana, R. (2017). Cash Waqf Models of Baitul Maal wat Tamwil in Indonesia (February).

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Baharuddin, M. R. (2021). Adaptasi kurikulum merdeka belajar kampus merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM program studi). Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 195–205.

Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (1 ed.). (2020). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Buro, H. H. (2018). Wakaf Esensi Solutif Perbaikan Pendidikan: Jawabah Dilema Lulusan Pendidikan Islam Antara Output, Outcome dan Produk.

Đurek, V., Kadoić, N., & Dobrović, Ž. (2018). Digital Maturity of Higher Education Institution: A meta model of the Analytical Network Process (ANP) and Decision Expert (DEX). Proceedings of Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems 2018, 223–230.

Fadilah Hasib, F., & Slamet Rusydiana, A. (2022). Developing Micro Waqf Bank in Indonesia: A Delphi-SWOT Analysis. Islamic Social Finance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58968/isf.v2i1.132

Hadiwardoyo, W. (2020). Kerugian Ekonomi Nasional Akibat Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 83–92.

Hays, J., & Reinders, H. (2020). Sustainable learning and education: A curriculum for the future. International Review of Education, 66(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09820-7

Heimer, C., & Vince, R. (1998). Sustainable learning and change in international teams: From imperceptible behaviour to rigorous practice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 19(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739810208656

Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT Analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251.

Intiana, S. R. H., Prihartini, A. A., Handayani, F., & Faridi, K. (2023). Independent Curriculum and the Indonesian Language Education throughout the Era of Society 5.0: A Literature Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 911–921.

Ionescu, C. A., Paschia, L., Gudanescu Nicolau, N. L., Stanescu, S. G., Neacsu Stancescu, V. M., Coman, M. D., & Uzlau, M. C. (2020). Sustainability Analysis of the E-Learning Education System during Pandemic Period—COVID-19 in Romania. Sustainability, 12(21), 9030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219030

Leal Filho, W., & Brandli, L. (Ed.). (2016). Engaging Stakeholders in Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0

Malik, S. A. (2013). Integrating Ahp, Swot And Qspm In Strategic Planning- An Application To College Of Business Administration In Saudi Arabia. 13.

Mendikbud RI. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Dalam Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI (hlm. 1–76).

Mudzhar, A. (2017). Pesantren Transformatif: Respon Pesantren Terhadap Perubahan Sosial. Dalam EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan (Vol. 6, Nomor 2). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v6i2.186

Nisak, Z. (2013). Analisis SWOT untuk menentukan strategi kompetitif. Jurnal Ekbis, 9(2), 468–476.

Nofrizal, N., Arizal, N., Waldelmi, I., Aznuriyandi, A., Khairani, Z., & Juju, U. (2022). Strategy Analysis of the Implementation of the MBKM Curriculum at the University. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5853–5872.

Oreski, D. (2012). Strategy development by using SWOT - AHP. TEM Journal, 1(4), 283–291.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Statistik Perbankan Syariah. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Maret-2023.aspx

Putra, P. (2021). Menilik Niat Masyarakat berpartisipasi dalam Crowdfunding pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19:(Studi Implementasi konsep Planned Behaviour Theory). Paradigma, 18(2), 73–83.

Putra, P., Fahlevi, R., Rahmawati, R., & Isfandayani, I. (2023). Merdeka Learning Campus Curriculum Design: A Review toward Islamic Banking Study Program in Universitas Islam 45. Paradigma, 20(1), 65–73.

Putra, P., Sawarjuwono, T., & Tirtajaya, M. D. (2021). Measuring a Crowdfunding Intention during Covid-19 Pandemic using Planned Behavior Approach. Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia, Magelang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311790

Rangkuti, F. (2014). Analisis SWOT: teknik membedah kasus bisnis cara perhitungan bobot rating dan OCAI.

Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2015). Assessment as Learning and Empowerment: Towards Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. Dalam M. Peris-Ortiz & J. M. Merigó Lindahl (Ed.), Sustainable Learning in Higher Education (hlm. 1–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_1

Rusydiana, A. S., & Devi, A. (2013). Mengurai Masalah dan Solusi Pengembangan Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syariah di Indonesia: Pendekatan Metode BOCR ANP. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islami, 3.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Afabeta.

Taleghani, M., & Taleghani, A. (2023). Designing a Mixed Model (ANP-SWOT) to Evaluate Practical Scenarios in the Development of Rural Cooperatives in Iran. Frontiers in Education Technology, 6(2), p45. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v6n2p45

Živković, Ž., Nikolić, D., Savić, M., Djordjević, P., & Mihajlović, I. (2017). Prioritizing Strategic Goals in Higher Education Organizations by Using a SWOT–PROMETHEE/GAIA–GDSS Model. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(4), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9533-y

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4294