Implementing AMETTA (Active, Joyful, and Unstressed) in Increasing Learning Activity and Outcomes

Yenni Hasnah; Pirman Ginting; Selamat Husni Hasibuan

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.300

Implementing AMETTA (Active, Joyful, and Unstressed) in Increasing Learning Activity and Outcomes

Yenni Hasnah, Pirman Ginting, Selamat Husni Hasibuan

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the learning model's practice and its effect on increasing student activity and learning outcomes in listening subjects. This study employed quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The data were gained using observation and tests. It is analyzed by reflection and statistical test of SPPS. The results show that the application of the AMETTA learning model effectively develops student learning activities and outcomes. The result of hypothesis testing with sig. (2-tailed) was 0.033 (˂ 0.05) It indicates that Ho is rejected. Thus, there is a significant difference between the average student learning outcomes in the experimental and control classes. In other words, the application of AMETTA learning model has a significant effect on students’ learning outcomes.

Keywords

AMETTA learning model; learning outcomes; learning activity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Dzulfikri, M. & Joko. (2013). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran aktif dengan strategi pembelajaran reconnecting terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran menggunakan hasil pengukuran kelas xi titl semester i di smkn 7 surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2 (2), 515-522.

Hanafiah, N., & Suhana, C. (2009). Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hasnah, Y., Ginting, P., & Dewi, R.S. (2020). Ametta Learning Model Design (Active, Fun And Without Pressure). Jurnal Tarbiyah, 27 (2), 113-129. DOI: 10.30829/tar.v27i2.773

Iru, L., & Arihi, L.O.S. (2012). Pendekatan, Metode, Strategi, dan Model-Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Presindo.

Jumarniati & Anas, A. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Dan Aktivitas Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pgsd. CJPE: Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.222019.113.

Kariadi, D. &Suprapto, W. (2018). Model pembelajaran active learning dengan strategi pengajuan pertanyaan untuk meningkatkan kualitas proses pembelajaran pkn. Jurnal Educatio, 12 (1), 10-21.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian Authentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mulyasa, E,. (2007). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.

Novianty, F,. (2017). Analisis aktivitas belajar melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe course review horay pada mata kuliah pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Sosial Horizon: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 4(1), 11-20.

Rusman. (2011). Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sanusi, U. (2013). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan humanistic (penelitian pada mts negeri model cigugur kuningan. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam- Ta’lim, 11(2), 123-142.

Sardiman, A.M. (2016). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Sari, L.W., Cawang, & Rizmahardian A.K. (2017). Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Stuktur Atom Kelas X Mia Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 4 Pontianak. Ar-Razi, 5(1), 45-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/arz.v5i1.652

Siahaan, F.B. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran aktif tipe quiz team terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan FKIP-UHN, 1 (1), 34-45.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.300