Correlation Between Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability Based on Gender

Irham Habibi Harahap

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between students' motivation to learn and their mathematical problem-solving abilities based on their gender. This study employs a quantitative method with a correlation survey approach to assess students' motivation and mathematical problem-solving abilities. It involves 73 students from Madrasah Tsanawiyah. The data analysis technique used in this study was the product-moment correlation test, which yielded a value of 0.001 for sig.(2-tailed). Means 0.001 <0.05, Ha is accepted, and H0 is rejected based on male students. The value of sig. (2-tailed) is 0.003, meaning 0.003 <0.05, Ha is accepted, and H0 is rejected based on female students. And the value of sig.(2-tailed) is 0.000, meaning 0.000 <0.05 then Ha is accepted, and H0 is rejected. There is a significant positive correlation between learning motivation and mathematical problem-solving with a correlation coefficient value of 0.435 then the level of correlation between variables is a moderate correlation. The coefficient of determination test is (0.435)2 x 100% = 18.92%. This means that only 18.92% of the contribution of the independent variable, namely learning motivation, to the dependent variable, is the student's mathematics learning outcomes and other things influence 81.08%.

Keywords


Learning Motivation, Problem Solving Ability, Gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharya, B. R. (2017). Factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics by mathematics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8-15.

Bal-Taştan, S., Davoudi, S. M. M., Masalimova, A. R., Bersanov, A. S., Kurbanov, R. A., Boiarchuk, A. V., & Pavlushin, A. A. (2018). The impacts of teacher’s efficacy and motivation on student’s academic achievement in science education among secondary and high school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353-2366.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In Building autonomous learners (pp. 9-29). Springer, Singapore.

Gattuso, L., & Ottaviani, M. G. (2011). Complementing mathematical thinking and statistical thinking in school mathematics. In Teaching statistics in school mathematics-Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 121-132). Springer, Dordrecht.

Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691-697.

Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and instruction, 35, 94-103.

Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school: Measurement and implications for motivation. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 247-269). Springer, Dordrecht.

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 805.

Liou, P. Y., Wang, C. L., Lin, J. J., & Areepattamannil, S. (2021). Assessing students’ motivational beliefs about learning science across grade level and gender. The Journal of Experimental Education, 89(4), 605-624.

Mazana, Y. M., Suero Montero, C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating students' attitude towards learning mathematics.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of mathematics education, 4(1), 89-100.

Rahardjo, A., & Pertiwi, S. (2020). Learning Motivation and Students’ Achievement in Learning English. JELITA, 1(2), 56-64.

Remillard, J. T. (2011). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In from text to'lived'resources (pp. 105-122). Springer, Dordrecht.

Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017). Learning motivation and student achievement: description analysis and correlations both. The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(1), 42-47.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, A., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215.

Roza, N., Arnawa, I., & Yerizon, Y. (2018). Practicality of mathematics learning tools based on discovery learning for topic sequence and series. International Journal of Scientific dan technology Research, 7(5), 236-241.

Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2019). Improving Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-72.

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The Effectiveness of STEM-Based on Gender Differences: The Impact of Physics Concept Understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753-761.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1127

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Irham Habibi Harahap

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.