Demystifying Conflict in Collaborative Writing: University EFL Students Case Study

Veniati Veniati, Endang Setyaningsih, Nur Arifah Drajati

Abstract


The interaction between writers is essential in collaborative writing. Unfortunately, conflict could occasionally disrupt the interaction. This case study explores the conflict and negotiation among sixteen Indonesian graduate students during the collaborative writing. Three students were selected as focal respondents based on three criteria: (1) students’ engagement in learning, (2) students’ gender, and (3) English proficiency. The data of the study were mainly obtained from observations, interviews, and document analysis. The collected data were then analyzed using interactive model analysis. The study revealed three types of conflict in collaborative writing: (1) cognitive conflict, (2) socio-emotional conflict, and (3) process conflict. The conflict reasons, resolutions, and impacts were identified and discussed. This study implies that conflict during collaborative writing can impact students' writing quality.

Keywords


Collaborative writing; Conflict; EFL writing; Negotiation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, A. F. (2007). Fundamentals of English Grammar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Widyatama.

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., and Oliveira, T., (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58-70.

Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL Students’ Difficulties and Needs in Essay Writing. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 111–121.

Bouachiba, A. (2013). The Importance of Proofreading in Reducing Students’ Mistakes in Writing The Case Study of Second Year LMD Students at Jijel University. Mohamed Khider University of Biskra. Thesis.

Bowen, G. A. (2015). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27-40.

Chen, X. W., & Lee, I. (2022). Conflicts in Peer Interaction of Collaborative Writing – A Case Study in an EFL Context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58.

Chen, W. (2020). Disagreement in peer interaction: its effect on learner task performance. System, 88, 102179.

Delgado-Osorio, X., Koval, V., Hartig, J., & Harsch, C. (2023). Strategic processing of source text in reading-into-writing tasks: A comparison between summary and argumentative tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62, 101227.

Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.

Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative Writing Features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.

Hasan, J., & Marzuki, M. (2017). An Analysis of Student’s Ability in Writing at Riau University Pekanbaru. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 380–388.

Lestari, I. D. (2019). The implementation of small group discussion in teaching writing recount text for the tenth grade students of SMKN 1 Bendo. English Teaching Journal: A journal of English Literature, Linguistics, and Education, 7(2), 20-27.

Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882-904.

Lin, O. P., & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative Writing in Summary Writing: Student Perceptions and Problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 599-606.

Lowry, P., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66-99.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage: London.

Moran, S. (2009). What Role Does Commitment Play Among Writers With Different Levels of Creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 243–257.

Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.

O’Neill, T. A., & McLarnon, M. J. W. (2018). Optimizing team conflict dynamics for high performance teamwork. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 378–394.

Pham, V. P. Ho. (2021). The effects of lecturer’s model e-comments on graduate students’ peer e-comments and writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 324-357.

Simatupang, A. J. (2017). The Writing Benefits of Increased Student’s Reading Comprehension: A Case Study at Universitas Kristen Indonesia. Journal of English Teaching, 3(3), 117-187.

Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: Sage.

Singh, S., & Kaur, M. (2015). The effect of reading on improving the writing of EFL students. Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(4), 1115-1138.

Scotland, J. (2016). How the experience of assessed collaborative writing impacts on undergraduate students’ perceptions of assessed group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 15-34.

Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 443-454, 3rd ed.). CA: Sage Publications

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Suchroni, P., Sumarsih., & Ginting, S. A. (2021). The realization of impoliteness strategies used by students in English online learning through zoom during pandemic covid-19. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana Unimed, 18(3), 253-264.

Zabihi, R. (2020). The effects of task type on the resolution of grammatical cognitive conflict episodes and grammar learning. The Language Learning Journal,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3741

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Veniati

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.