Assessment of Attitude tetep, antep, mantep in the Teaching: Ki Hadjar Dewantara Perspective

Rahayu Retnaningsih, Samsi Haryanto, Awang Damar, Puspa Eka Ayu Febriana

Abstract


Ki Hadjar Dewantara's tetep, antep, and mantep attitude assessment is the focus of this research. Descriptive qualitative research is conducted in the form of a literature review that objectively examines the process of developing Ki Hajar Dewantara's attitude evaluation instrument (tetep, antep, mantep). The purpose of the descriptive method is to provide sufficient background information for further analysis and conclusion drawing. Analysis and recording of studies serve as the basis for the data collection. Books and articles are gathered for research at libraries. Data collected from documentation and field data poured in a thorough and detailed report description form the basis of the interactive model analysis. A summary is created at the outset of data gathering, which is when data reduction occurs. The next step is trimming the data and field reports to the essentials, highlighting the most relevant information, and looking for recurring themes or patterns. Data is reduced in complexity by selection, classification, and abstraction. Data visualisation aids researchers in gaining a better understanding of the whole or of specific subsets of their data. Fourth, by categorising the data, researchers are able to draw meaningful conclusions. The study's findings indicated that the sensitivity index value was the most reliable predictor of Ki Hadjar Dewantara's tetep, antep, and mantep attitudes towards his students' academic progress. Contextual learning models that incorporate local expertise can be used to refine evaluations of Ki Hadjar Dewantara's tetep, antep, mantep attitude.

Keywords


Attitude assessment, tetep, antep, mantep, Content Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Refika Aditama Aisyah.

Ahmal, A., Supentri, S., Pernantah, P. S., & Hardian, M. (2020). Peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik guru melalui pelatihan perangkat pembelajaran abad-21 berbasis merdeka belajar di Kabupaten Pelalawan Riau. Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement, 2, 432–439. https://doi.org/10.31258/unricsce.2.432-439.

Asrul., Ananda, R. & Rosnita. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (cet. kedua). Bandung: Citapustaka Media.

Dewantara, Ki Hajar. (2009). Menuju Manusia Merdeka. Yogyakarta: Leutika.

Dewantara, Ki Hajar. (2013). Pemikiran, Konsepsi, Keteladanan, Sikap Merdeka: Jilid II Kebudayaan. (Cetakan Kelima). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa (UST-Press) bekerjasama dengan Majelis Luhur Persatuan Tamansiswa.

Elviana, P. S. (2017). Pembentukan Sikap Mandiri Dantanggung Jawab Melalui Penerapan Metode Sosiodrama Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Citizenship Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.25273/citizenship.v5i2.1643

Fakhriyah, F. (2014). Penerapan problem based learning dalam upaya mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2906.

Firman, H, (2000). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Dalam Pengajaran. Bandung FMIPA UPI.

Fook, C. Y. &, & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic Assessment and Pedagogical Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153–161.

Kunandar, (2013). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik): Suatu Pendekatan Praktis Disertai Dengan Contoh. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Majid,A. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mardapi, D, (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Nuha Medika

Mulyasa. (2018). Manajemen Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nizarani, N., Kristiawan, M., & Sari, A. P. (2020). Manajemen Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains, 9(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v9i1.5432.

Mas’udi. (2014). Evaluasi Sistem Pembelajaran. Junal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal. 2 (2). 317-326.

Muhammad, F dan Lilif, M.K 2013. Pendidikan Karakter Anak.

Musfiqon, H.M.& Nurdyansyah. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik (cet pertama). Sidoarjo : Nizamia Learning Center

Mustofa, R. A., & Supriyoko, S. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen pengukuran nilai kemandirian terkait mata pelajaran matematika (Studi empirik di SMA Negeri 1 Sleman). Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 70-75.

Sagala, S. (2017). Human Capital: Membangun Modal Sumber Daya Manusia Berkarakter Unggul Melalui Pendidikan Berkualitas. Depok: Kencana.

Slameto.( 2016). Belajar & Faktor – Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya Cetakan Keenam. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sani, R.A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Steinberg, R., & Cormier, S. (2013). Understanding and affecting science teacher candidates’ scientific reasoning in introductory astrophysics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(2): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020111.

Subali, B. (2016). Prinsip asesmen dan evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Sudijono,A. (2012). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Sukanti. (2011). Penilaian Afektif dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 9(1), 74–82.

Syafril, & Zen, Z. (2017). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Depok: Kencana




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2729

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Rahayu Retnaningsih, Samsi Haryanto, Awang Damar, Puspa Eka Ayu Febriana

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.