A Case Study in Indonesıa: Explorıng AI Readıness in Busıness Students Toward Englısh Wrıtıng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5118Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, AI readiness, English for Specific Purpose, Business English WritingAbstract
References
AlAfnan, M. A., et al. (2023). ChatGPT as an Educational Tool: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Communication, Business Writing, and Composition Courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Ahmadian, MJ, Pouromid, S., Nickkhah, M. (2015). Collaborating in First Language while Writing in Second Language: A Unique Writing Experience
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57(May), 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Boyang Chen, Zongxiao Wu & Ruoran Zhao (2023) From fiction to fact: the growing role of generative AI in business and finance, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2023.2245279
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C.K.Y. (2023). Is AI changing the rules of academic misconduct? An in-depth look at students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03358
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Creswell, JW (2014). Desain Penelitian: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran (edisi ke-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Fryer LK, Ainley M, Thompson A, et al. (2017) Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: an experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Computers in HumanBehavior 75: 461–468
Fryer LK, Nakao K and Thompson A (2019) Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior 93: 279–289
Guo, K., Wang, J., and Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots toscaffold efl students argumentative writing. Assess. Writing 54, 100666.doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666H
Goksel, N., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights and future perspectives. In Handbook of research on learning in the age of Transhumanism (pp. 224-236). IGI Global.
Green, F., et al. (2022). Working Still Harder. ILR Review, 75(2), 458–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920977850
Haristiani, N., & Rifa’i, M. M. (2020). Combining chatbot and social media: Enhancing personal learning environment (PLE) in language learning. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i3.28687
Heckadon, P., & Tuzlukova, V. (2021). Becoming a business writer: Omani ESP students' self-perceived writing challenges, needs and wants. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(4), 753-764. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104753H
Hiranburana, K. (2017). Use of English in the Thai workplace. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2015.10.002
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
Hwang, W. Y., Nurtantyana, R., Lai, Y. F., Chiang, I. C. N., Ghenia, G., & Tsai, M. H. M. (2023). The Combination of Recognition Technology and Artificial Intelligence for Questioning and Clarification Mechanisms to Facilitate Meaningful EFL Writing in Authentic Contexts. In Y. M. Huang & T. Rocha (Eds.), Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 14099. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_7
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
Jitpanich, T., Leong, L.M., & Ismail, S.A.M.M. (2022). Assessing the English writing needs of undergraduate business administration students for ESP writing course development: A case study in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 104-128.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lashari, A. A., et al. (2023). Unlocking the potentials of ChatGPT: The efficacy of ChatGPT in ESL learning outcomes. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 20(1), 1135-1143. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/12018
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076.4
Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
Ma, Q., & Yan, J. (2021). How to empirically and theoretically incorporate digital technologies into language learning and teaching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672892100078X
Marzuki, U. W., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Nurlatifah, L., & Yusuf, F. N. (2022). Students' Problems in Writing Analytical Exposition Text in EFL Classroom Context. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6633
Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2021). What makes a good language teacher in a changing world? Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 1-16. http://jelep.bru.ac.th/2021/12/02/%e0%b9%8bjel-vol-2-no-2-july-decemer-2021
Rettberg, S. (2023) Cyborg Authorship: Writing with AI – Part 1: The Trouble(s) with ChatGPT. Electronic Book Review. https://doi.org/10.7273/5sy5-rx37
Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and Their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035
Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. (2016). EFL Indonesian Students’ Attitude toward Writing in English. Arab World English Journal, 7(4), 365–378.
Sparks, J. R., Song, Y., Brantley, W., & Liu, O. L. (2014). Assessing written communication in higher education: Review and recommendations for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report. Retrieved May 26, 2021, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ full/10.1002/ets2.12035.
Susan Geertshuis, Rob Wass & Qian Liu (2022) Equipping graduates with future-ready capabilities: an application of learning theories to higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2022.2137399
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Toba, R., Noor, W., & Sanu, L. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Wahyuni, S., & Umam, M. K. (2017). An Analysis on Writing Anxiety of Indonesian EFL College Learners. Journal of English Education and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 103–126.
Wang, L., & Fan, J. (2020). Assessing business English writing: the development and validation of a proficiency scale. Assessing Writing, 46(May), 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100490.
Wedell, M. and Grassick, L. (2023). Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C.A. Chapelle (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0540.pub2
Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J. (2023). Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2167830
Yan, D. Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Educ Inf Technol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). Chatbot-based training on logical fallacy in EFL argumentative writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2197417
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



