Teachers’ Constraints in Organizing Learning Process for High School Students in Jambi

Authors

  • Harbeng Masni Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Indonesia
  • Zuhri Saputra Hutabarat Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Herman Budiyono Universitas jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1667

Keywords:

teacher constraints, organizing learning process, high school student

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the constraints faced by high school teachers in Jambi in the students learning process. Those constrains are ranging from planning, implementing, to evaluating learning outcomes. The study was conducted in public high school in Jambi for 8 months. Subjects in this study are subject teachers, principals, supervisors, and supervisors. While the object of this research includes teacher learning documents and infrastructure facilities. This research uses qualitative approach and based on field study. It belongs to phenomenological research and includes descriptive research type. The data were collected using questionnaires, interview guides, observation guides, documentation, and portfolios. The result of the research reveals that public high school teachers in Jambi are experiencing difficulties in planning process of learning. Some hindrances found in the process of implementing student learning in the classroom are the large number of students in each class and the lack of supporting facilities and infrastructure. Whereas the hindrance in the process of evaluating student learning outcomes came from ineffective design qualities.

References

Alfian, Eli Suraya, & Yusraini. (2011). “Dampak Sertifikasi Guru terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Proses Pembelajaran: Studi Kasus di MAN Model Jambi.†Jurnal. Jambi: Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin.

Arikunto, S. dan Cepi SAJ. (2004) .Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Brown, D. (2007). Prinsip Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Bahasa Edisi Kelima, terj. Noor Cholis dan Yusi Avianto Pareanom. Boston: Paearson Education. h. 8.

Carey, Walter, D. and Lou C. (1994). The Systematic Design of Instructional 3rd Edition . Glenview: Scot, Foresman and Company. hh. 15-27.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects Third Edition. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, Open University Press.

Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005a) ‘Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research’, in N. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dewantara, KH. 2004. Pendidikan, Cetakan Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa. h. 25.

Fullan, M. (2000). Change Forces the Sequel. Philadelphia: George Muchamm. h. 43, 267, 268.

Gagne, RM., dan Leslie J. Briggs. (1978). Principles of Instructional Design Second Edition. New York, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. h. 1, 123, 133.

Guba, EG. and Yvonna SL. (1983). Effective Evaluation, Improving the usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher.

Hadjar, (1999). Dasar-dasar Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Huda, M. K. (2011). “Peranan sertifikasi Guru terhadap Peningkatan Etos Kerja Guru PAI (Studi kasus terhadap guru PAI MTs N Yogyakarta 1).†Tesis. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan kalijaga.

Jogiyanto. (2005). Sistem Teknologi Informasi Pendekatan Terintegrasi: Konsep Dasar, Teknologi, Aplikasi, Pengembangan, dan Pengelolaan Edisi II. Yogyakarta: Andi. h. 34.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, (1994). The Program Evaluation Standard. California: Sage Publication.

Jones, P., dan Rita D. (2011). “Instructional Design Methods Integrating Instructional Technology,†dalam Instructional Design: Concept, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, ed. Mehdi Khosrow. New York, Hershey: Information Science Reference. h. 101.

Kahan, Barbara dan Kael Consulting, (2008). Review of Evaluation Frameworks. Saskatchewan: Ministry of Education.

Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance The ARCS Model Approach. New York: Springer.

Marquardt, Michael J. (2002). Building the Learning Organization Mastering the 5 Elements for Corporate Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing, Inc.

Miarso, Yusufhadi. (2011). Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana dan Pustekom Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Muhadjir, Noeng. (1996). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Mujid, Abdul. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran.Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.

Mark, Melvin M. dan Debra JR. (2010). The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Program Officer and COTR Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings National Science Foundation.

Marynowski, S. (2006). Best Practices Guide to Program Evaluation For Aquatic Educators. Florida: Pandion Systems, Inc.

Madaus, GF., Michael SS, and Daniel LS. (1985). Evaluation Model, Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston : Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook. San Francisco, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Moleong, LJ. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Moore, KD. (2005). Effective Instructional Strategies from Theori to Practice. California: Sage Publication. h. 8.

Morrison, G.R., at.al. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction Fifth Edition. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. h. 2.

Muslich, M. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat satuan Pendidikan, Dasar Pemahaman dan Pengembangan. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Nuh, M. (2012). “Kurikulum Disesuaikan dengan Zaman,†Kompas: Rabu, 5 September 2012.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Pasal 19, Ayat 3, h. 11.

Pritchard, A. and John W. (2010). Psychology for The Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning. London & New York: RoutledgeTaylor & Francis Group. h. 6, 239.

Reigeluth, Charles M. and Chellman. (2009). Instructional Design Theories and Models, dikutip tidak langsung oleh Marcy P. Driscoll, Psychology of Leaming for lnstruction, Second Edition. Massachusetts: Pearson Education Company.

Rothwell, W.J. dan H.C. Kazanas, (2004). Mastering The Instructional Design Process Third Edition. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Santrock, JW. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media. h. 266.

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. h. 121.

Suparman, M. A. (2012). Desain Instruksional Modern. Jakarta: Erlangga. h. 119.

Strauss, Anselm dan Juliet Corbin. (2003). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. and Anthony J. Shinkfield, (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Tomei, Lawrence A. (2008). Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration. New York: Hersey, Information Science Reference, 2008.

Yamin, M. (2011). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-07

How to Cite

Masni, H., Hutabarat, Z. S., & Budiyono, H. (2022). Teachers’ Constraints in Organizing Learning Process for High School Students in Jambi. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 4939–4946. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1667

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 4 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.