An Investigation the Competence of Preservice Teachers of Economics in the Industrial Revolution Era: A Literature Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1093

Keywords:

phase, level, knowledge, cognitive, non-cognitive

Abstract

In the 21st Century, advances in information and technology have spurred open access to economic learning for preservice teachers. Reinventing competencies needs to be done to keep pace with the advancement of knowledge and technology in the industrial revolution era. This paper aims to investigate the competence of preservice teachers of economics in the industrial revolution era. The literature review is used to find the challenges faced and the competencies needed by prospective economics teachers. Various relevant and credible literature (Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Emerald) for two decades have been fast reviewed and comprehensively to show the phases, levels, knowledge, competencies, and cognitive-noncognitive domains. The review findings reveal the challenges that preservice teachers of economics face as a provision for mastering competencies as teachers in the industrial revolution era. Next, a synthesis of the competency reviews is needed for preservice teachers of economics to present relevant and credible studies. Finally, this paper has implications for competencies that need to be prepared or reinvented through actions and policies that lead to professional economics teachers.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Bukhori Dalimunthe, Universitas Negeri Medan

Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Medan

Suranto Suranto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial

Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

References

Adu, E. O., Ojelabi, S. A., & Adeyanju, H. (2009). Quantitative ability as correlates of students’ academic achievement in secondary school Economics in Oyo State, Nigeria. African Research Review, 3(2), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v3i2.43633

Allgood, S., & Bayer, A. (2016). Measuring college learning in economics. In Improving quality in American higher education: Learning outcomes and assessments for the 21st century (pp. 87–134). John Wiley & Sons.

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154. p.10

Aspelin, J., & Jonsson, A. (2019). Relational competence in teacher education. Concept analysis and report from a pilot study. Teacher Development, 23(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1570323

Association, A. L. (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy : Final report. Http://Www.Ala.Org/Ala/Acrl/Acrlpubs/Whitepapers/Presidential.Htm. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10018287097/en/

Becker, W. E. (2000). Teaching Economics in the 21st Century. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.1.109

Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk-and-Talk. American Economic Review, 91(2), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.446

Bosshardt, W. (2020). Designing and communicating new pedagogy ideas in economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845263

Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K., Schmitz, B., Berger, S., Fritsch, S., & Seifried, J. (2015). Professional Competence of Prospective Teachers in Business and Economics Education: Evaluation of a Competence Model Using Structural Equation Modeling. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068076

Burnett, C., Davies, J., Merchant, G., & Rowsell, J. (2014). New Literacies around the Globe: Policy and Pedagogy. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bvcABAAAQBAJ

Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2015). The Challenge of 21st-Century Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.482

Carter, J., Noble, S., Russell, A., & Swanson, E. (2011). Developing statistical literacy using real-world data: investigating socioeconomic secondary data resources used in research and teaching. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.609553

Clouse, R. W., & Alexander, E. (1997). Classrooms of the 21st Century: Teacher Competence, Confidence and Collaboration. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 26(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.2190/D7WM-BXVP-3CKD-0NGH

Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511

Dewi, R., Dalimunthe, R. Z., Rahmadana, M. F., Dalimunthe, M. B., & Airlangga, E. (2020). Self-resilience of students in drug initiations. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1).

Jeschke, C., Kuhn, C., Lindmeier, A., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Saas, H., & Heinze, A. (2019). Performance assessment to investigate the domain specificity of instructional skills among pre-service and in-service teachers of mathematics and economics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 538–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12277

Johannssen, A., Chukhrova, N., Schmal, F., & Stabenow, K. (2021). Statistical Literacy—Misuse of Statistics and Its Consequences. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1860727

Kuhn, C., Alonzo, A. C., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2016). Evaluating the pedagogical content knowledge of pre- and in-service teachers of business and economics to ensure quality of classroom practice in vocational education and training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 8(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0031-2

Kuhn, C., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Brückner, S., & Saas, H. (2018). A new video-based tool to enhance teaching economics. International Review of Economics Education, 27, 24–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.007

Larson, L., & Brown, J. S. (2017). Preparing Global-Ready Teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(3), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1334473

Maier, M. H., McGoldrick, K., & Simkins, S. P. (2012). Starting Point: Pedagogic Resources for Teaching and Learning Economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 43(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2012.660063

Méndez-Carbajo, D. (2016). Quantitative reasoning and information literacy in economics. In Information literacy: Research and collaboration across disciplines (pp. 305–322). WAC Clearinghouse and University of Colorado Press Fort Collins, Colorado. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/infolit/chapter15.pdf

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 6(7), 264–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Moryl, R. L. (2014). Podcasts as a Tool for Teaching Economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(3), 284–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2014.917915

Moryl, R. L., & Jiang, S. (2013). Using economics podcasts to engage students of different learning styles. International Advances in Economic Research, 19, 201+. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9396-1

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning Definition. In A Network of Battelle for Kids (pp. 1–9). http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf

Pilgrim, J., & Martinez, E. E. (2013). Defining Literacy in the 21st Century: A Guide to Terminology and Skills. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 1(1), 60–69. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1110822.pdf

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x

Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2011). In Search of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782580

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills. In The Netherlands: Kennisnet. University of Twente (Vol. 23, Issue 03). http://www.billielee.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/White-Paper-21st-CS-Reading-week-2.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-09-09

How to Cite

Dalimunthe, M. B., & Suranto, S. (2022). An Investigation the Competence of Preservice Teachers of Economics in the Industrial Revolution Era: A Literature Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5089–5098. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1093

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 4 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.